Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551408›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Long-term Outcomes of Therapeutic Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Patients ≥90 Years Old: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

Shinya Sugimoto, Aiji Hattori, Yuri Maegawa, Haruka Nakamura, Naoko Okuda, Toshifumi Takeuchi, Jun Oyamada, Akira Kamei, Hiroyuki Kawabata, Masatoshi Aoki and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinya SugimotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
Aiji HattoriDivision of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Matsusaka General Hospital, Japan.
Yuri MaegawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Japan.
Haruka NakamuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
Naoko OkudaDivision of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
Toshifumi TakeuchiDivision of Gastroenterology, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Japan.
Jun OyamadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
Akira KameiDivision of Gastroenterology, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Japan.
Hiroyuki KawabataDivision of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Matsusaka General Hospital, Japan.
Masatoshi AokiDivision of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Matsusaka General Hospital, Japan.
Hiroaki NaotaDivision of Gastroenterology, Matsusaka Chuo General Hospital, Japan.
Ise Red Cross Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The safety and prognosis of complete stone removal for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in older patients are unknown. This multicenter retrospective study assessed the outcomes of complete stone removal in elderly patients (≥90 years) with respect to the prognosis. Methods We divided patients who underwent endoscopic cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis into two groups: complete stone removal or incomplete stone removal with plastic stent insertion. The patient characteristics, adverse events, number of endoscopic cholangiopancreatographies, overall survival rates, and disease-specific cumulative death were compared between the groups. Patients Two hundred and twenty-three participants ≥90 years old were included in the study, including 48 (22%) men and 175 (78%) women. The median age was 92 (range, 90-104) years old. There were 160 (72%) and 63 (28%) patients in the complete and incomplete groups, respectively. Results The age, performance status, comorbidities, severe complication rates, and stone diameter were comparable between the groups. The proportion of patients with at least 5 stones was significantly higher in the incomplete group than in the complete group [complete group: 8.1% (13/160) and incomplete group: 21% (13/63), p<0.01]. The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the complete group (p<0.01), while the disease-specific cumulative death rate was higher in the incomplete group (p<0.01). Conclusion Complete stone removal for choledocholithiasis may contribute to a better prognosis in elderly patients ≥90 years old.

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisAgedAged, 80 and overCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSphincterotomy, EndoscopicTreatment Outcomebiliary tractcholedocholithiasiselderlyendoscopic cholangiopancreatographystone removalsurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID33551408
PMCPMC8313914
OpenAlexW3126956800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.