Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551282›Full record

SynthesisCardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions2022

Randomized Blinded Placebo-Controlled Trials of Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.

Yousif Ahmad, Christopher Kane, Ahran D Arnold, Christopher M Cook, Daniel Keene, Matthew Shun-Shin, Graham Cole, Rasha Al-Lamee, Darrel P Francis, James P Howard

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Ultra-long-term efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation in resistant hypertension: 10-year follow-up outcomes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Renal arteries denervation: from the treatment of resistant hypertension to the treatment of atrial fibrillation.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Renal denervation in hypertension patients: Proceedings from an expert consensus roundtable cosponsored by SCAI and NKF.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yousif AhmadNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA. Electronic address: dryousifahmad@gmail.com.
Christopher KaneNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahran D ArnoldNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher M CookNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel KeeneNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Matthew Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Graham ColeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rasha Al-LameeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Darrel P FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
James P HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS 04/079British Heart Foundation FS/15/53/31615British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/22/26039Medical Research Council MR/M018369/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212183/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe efficacy of renal denervation has been controversial, but the procedure has now undergone several placebo-controlled trials. New placebo-controlled trial data has recently emerged, with longer follow-up of one trial and the full report of another trial (which constitutes 27% of the total placebo-controlled trial data). We therefore sought to evaluate the effect of renal denervation on ambulatory and office blood pressures in patients with hypertension.

methodsWe systematically identified all blinded placebo-controlled randomized trials of catheter-based renal denervation for hypertension. The primary efficacy outcome was ambulatory systolic blood pressure change relative to placebo. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed.

results6 studies randomizing 1232 patients were eligible. 713 patients were randomized to renal denervation and 519 to placebo. Renal denervation significantly reduced ambulatory systolic blood pressure (-3.52 mmHg; 95% CI -4.94 to -2.09; p < 0.0001), ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (-1.93 mmHg; 95% CI -3.04 to -0.83, p = 0.0006), office systolic blood pressure size (-5.10 mmHg; 95% CI -7.31 to -2.90, p < 0.0001) and office diastolic pressure (effect size -3.11 mmHg; 95% CI -4.43 to -1.78, p < 0.0001). Adverse events were rare and not more common with denervation.

conclusionsThe totality of blinded, randomized placebo-controlled data shows that renal denervation is safe and provides genuine reduction in blood pressure for at least 6 months post-procedure. If this effect continues in the long term, renal denervation might provide a life-long 10% relative risk reduction in major adverse cardiac events and 7.5% relative risk reduction in all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsHypertensionBlood PressureDenervationHumansKidneyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSympathectomyTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsHypertensionMeta-analysisRenal denervation

Identifiers

PMID33551282
PMCPMC8813172
OpenAlexW3127528462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.