Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551208›Full record

ArticleResearch in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP2021

Long-term evaluation of a train-the-trainer workshop for pharmacy faculty using the RE-AIM framework.

Nervana Elkhadragy, Robin L Corelli, Alan J Zillich, Noll L Campbell, Karen Suchanek Hudmon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nervana ElkhadragyUniversity of Wyoming, School of Pharmacy, 1000 E University Ave, Laramie, WY, 82071, USA; Purdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: nelkhadr@uwyo.edu.
Robin L CorelliUniversity of California, San Francisco School of Pharmacy, 533 Parnassus Avenue [U-585], San Francisco, CA, 94143-0622, USA. Electronic address: robin.corelli@ucsf.edu.
Alan J ZillichPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: azillich@purdue.edu.
Noll L CampbellPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: campbenl@purdue.edu.
Karen Suchanek HudmonPurdue University College of Pharmacy, 640 Eskenazi Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA; University of California, San Francisco School of Pharmacy, 533 Parnassus Avenue [U-585], San Francisco, CA, 94143-0622, USA. Electronic address: khudmon@purdue.edu.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Standardized Patients to Assess Competency in Tobacco Cessation CounselingR25CA174665 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI HUDMON, KAREN S · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Diseminating a Tobacco Curriculum for Pharmacy SchoolsR25CA090720 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HUDMON, KAREN S · 2002 to 2005
$784k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA090720NCI NIH HHS R25 CA174665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough two thirds of tobacco users express interest in quitting, few pharmacists address tobacco use as part of routine practice. Historically, pharmacy schools provided inadequate tobacco cessation training for students. To address this educational gap, train-the-trainer workshops were conducted between 2003 and 2005 to train pharmacy faculty (n = 191) to teach a shared, national tobacco cessation curriculum at their academic institutions.

objectiveTo characterize faculty perceptions of the train-the-trainer workshops and estimate the long-term reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) of the shared curriculum at pharmacy schools.

methodsThis study is the second phase of a sequential mixed methods study. Results from Phase 1, a qualitative study, informed the development of survey items for Phase 2. Applying the RE-AIM framework, a web-based survey was developed and administered to train-the-trainer participants.

resultsOf 191 trainees, 137 were locatable; of these, 111 completed a survey (81.0%). Most (n = 87; 78.4%) reported current employment in academia. The most highly rated reason for attending a workshop was to improve teaching of tobacco cessation content, and 98.1% reported moderate or high confidence for teaching tobacco cessation. Among those who practice in a clinical setting, 70.6% reported asking their patients about tobacco use all or almost all the time. Just over three fourths of faculty respondents who work in academia believe that shared curricula should be more broadly considered for use in pharmacy schools, and 79.0% agreed that shared curricula are a cost-effective approach to teaching.

conclusionEvidence is provided for long-term reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of the Rx for Change shared tobacco cessation training program. Participants perceived that the workshop resulted in long-term, positive effects on their careers as well as their teaching and clinical practice.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyFaculty, PharmacyCurriculumFacultyHumansSchools, PharmacyCurriculum implementationFaculty developmentFaculty trainingPharmacy educationSmoking cessationTobacco cessation

Identifiers

PMID33551208
PMCPMC8286451
OpenAlexW3110102199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.