Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33551068›Full record

Trial reportESMO open2020

BIG BANG study (EPOC1703): multicentre, proof-of-concept, phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with binimetinib, encorafenib and cetuximab in patients with BRAF non-V600E mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.

Daisuke Kotani, Hideaki Bando, Hiroya Taniguchi, Toshiki Masuishi, Yoshito Komatsu, Kensei Yamaguchi, Takako Nakajima, Taroh Satoh, Tomohiro Nishina, Taito Esaki and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic landscape and future direction of metastatic colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Management ofFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke KotaniDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hideaki BandoDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan. Electronic address: hbando@aichi-cc.jp.
Hiroya TaniguchiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshito KomatsuDepartment of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kensei YamaguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takako NakajimaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Taroh SatohFrontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Tomohiro NishinaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Taito EsakiDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Shogo NomuraClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Koji TakahashiClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Shinobu IidaClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Seiko MatsudaClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Shinya MotonagaClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Nozomu FuseClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Akihiro SatoClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Satoshi FujiiPathology Division, Research Center for Innovative Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Atsushi OhtsuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan.
Hiromichi EbiDivision of Oncological Pathology, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Takayuki YoshinoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNational Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the BRAF V600E mutation occurs in 5%-15% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), BRAF non-V600E mutations were recently reported to range from 1.6% to 5.1%. We have previously reported that BRAF non-V600E mutations could have a negative impact on efficacy outcomes as well as BRAF V600E mutation for antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody treatment for pretreated patients with mCRC. Recently, simultaneous inhibitions of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK), BRAF and EGFR exhibited relevant antitumour activities in patients with BRAF V600E mutant and also in BRAF non-V600E mutant but only in the preclinical model. TRIAL

designThe BIG BANG (study is a multicentre, phase II study to assess the efficacy, safety and proof of concept of the combinations of binimetinib+encorafenib+cetuximab in patients with BRAF non-V600E mutated mCRC, identified by either tumour tissue (tumour tissue group) or blood samples (liquid biopsy group). Key eligibility criteria include Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of ≤1, mCRC with BRAF non-V600E mutant and RAS wild type, refractory or intolerant to at least one fluoropyrimidine-based regimen and no prior history of regorafenib, and no prior history of anti-EGFR antibody treatment (primary analysis cohort and liquid biopsy cohort) or refractory to prior anti-EGFR antibody treatment in patients with class 3 BRAF mutations (anti-EGFR antibody refractory class three cohort). Enrolled patients receive binimetinib (45 mg, two times per day), encorafenib (300 mg, once a day) and cetuximab (initially 400 mg/m TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: UMIN000031857 and 000031860.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBenzimidazolesCarbamatesCetuximabFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafStroke VolumeSulfonamidesVentricular Function, LeftYoung AdultBenzimidazolesbinimetinibBRAF protein, humanCarbamatesCetuximabencorafenibProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesbinimetinibBRAF non-V600Ecetuximabencorafenibmetastatic colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33551068
PMCPMC7046405
OpenAlexW3006475107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.