ArticleBioengineered2021
Bio-herbicidal potential of wheat rhizosphere bacteria on
Article in Bioengineered, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable tea plantations: Harnessing chemical-microbial synergy and smart application triangulation for targeted weed control.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Herbicidal Control Potential of the Endophytic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Comparative genome analysis of endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MR4: a potential biocontrol agent isolated from wild medicinal plant root tissue.Journal of applied genetics · 2024Article
- Transcriptome Sequencing and Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Harnessing NativeApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023Review
- Plant-Associated Bacteria as Sources for the Development of Bioherbicides.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Investigation of bacterial diversity inBioengineered · 2021Article
- Fungicides alter the distribution and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities in ginseng fields.Bioengineered · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to isolated and identified the bacterial strains from wheat rhizosphere and evaluated the effect of different concentration of bacterial fermentation broth on the wild oats weed growth. This experiment carried out the separation and purification of dominant bacterial strains from the wheat rhizosphere soil, and performed the fermentation broth biological activity assessment by measured the seed germination and plant growth from 20 wheat varieties. The results had shown that the bacterial fermentation broth inhibits the growth of wild oat seedlings and plants to varying degrees, bacterial strains of X3, X4, X8, X12, X16 and X20 has certain level of inhibition activity and X20 has the highest herbicidal effectiveness. According to molecular biology identification, obtained superior bacterial strains X20 was
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.