ReviewAccounts of chemical research2021
Fuzziness and Frustration in the Energy Landscape of Protein Folding, Function, and Assembly.
Review in Accounts of chemical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
76 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- From static structures to dynamic energy landscapes: the latest revolution in molecular biology.Current opinion in structural biology · 2026Review
- Efficient synthesis of complex supramolecular topologies via coordination angle modulation.National science review · 2026Article
- Explainable AI reveals the allosteric blind spot in protein-ligand binding predictions.Cell reports. Physical science · 2026Article
- Decoding the allosteric grammar of protein kinases: A dual-stream framework integrating protein language models and energy landscape frustration analysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- COMPASS: A Computational Pipeline to Identify Linkers Predicting Ubiquitinable PROTAC-Induced Ternary Complexes.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- HyRes: Accurate Physics-Based Simulation of Dynamic Protein Structures and Interactions in Complex Environments at Scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Sequence-Encoded Frustration Directs the Formation of Abridged G-Quadruplex Architectures.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
- Screening for novel chemical scaffolds targeting PCNA identifies the Hsp90alpha inhibitor SNX-2112.Current research in structural biology · 2026Article
- Predicting and Decoding Allosteric Binding Sites Using Protein Language Models and Structure-Based Machine Learning: An Energy Landscape-Guided Explainable AI Framework.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Determinants of Protein Folding Pathways: Lessons from Metamorphic Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- FuzDrop: sequence-based prediction of the propensity of proteins for liquid-liquid phase separation and aggregation.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- Native-Like Protein Structures in Vacuo: Steric Cooperativity as a Kinetic Barrier to Denaturation.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Newton's cradle-like allosteric mechanism explains regulatory RsmE RNA binding.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Information-Theoretic and Conceptual Density Functional Theory Insights on Frustration in Molecular Clusters.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Atypical β-strand insertion mediates the noncovalent cross-linking in amyloid aggregates.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Binding Specificity and Local Frustration in Structure-based Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Dissecting the Structural Features of Folding Asymmetry and Transient Misfolding in a Multidomain PDZ Scaffold.Small science · 2026Article
- Improving enzymatic properties of BlTDH fromFood chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Frustration in the protein-protein interface plays a central role in the cooperativity of PROTAC ternary complexes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Designing single-polymer-chain nanoparticles to mimic biomolecular hydration frustration.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Are all protein interactions fully optimized? Do suboptimal interactions compromise specificity? What is the functional impact of frustration? Why does evolution not optimize some contacts? Proteins and their complexes are best described as ensembles of states populating an energy landscape. These ensembles vary in breadth from narrow ensembles clustered around a single average X-ray structure to broader ensembles encompassing a few different functional "taxonomic" states on to near continua of rapidly interconverting conformations, which are called "fuzzy" or even "intrinsically disordered". Here we aim to provide a comprehensive framework for confronting the structural and dynamical continuum of protein assemblies by combining the concepts of energetic frustration and interaction fuzziness. The diversity of the protein structural ensemble arises from the frustrated conflicts between the interactions that create the energy landscape. When frustration is minimal after folding, it results in a narrow ensemble, but residual frustrated interactions result in fuzzy ensembles, and this fuzziness allows a versatile repertoire of biological interactions. Here we discuss how fuzziness and frustration play off each other as proteins fold and assemble, viewing their significance from energetic, functional, and evolutionary perspectives.We demonstrate, in particular, that the common physical origin of both concepts is related to the ruggedness of the energy landscapes, intramolecular in the case of frustration and intermolecular in the case of fuzziness. Within this framework, we show that alternative sets of suboptimal contacts may encode specificity without achieving a single structural optimum. Thus, we demonstrate that structured complexes may not be optimized, and energetic frustration is realized via different sets of contacts leading to multiplicity of specific complexes. Furthermore, we propose that these suboptimal, frustrated, or fuzzy interactions are under evolutionary selection and expand the biological repertoire by providing a multiplicity of biological activities. In accord, we show that non-native interactions in folding or interaction landscapes can cooperate to generate diverse functional states, which are essential to facilitate adaptation to different cellular conditions. Thus, we propose that not fully optimized structures may actually be beneficial for biological activities of proteins via an alternative set of suboptimal interactions. The importance of such variability has not been recognized across different areas of biology.This account provides a modern view on folding, function, and assembly across the protein universe. The physical framework presented here is applicable to the structure and dynamics continuum of proteins and opens up new perspectives for drug design involving not fully structured, highly dynamic protein assemblies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.