Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550529›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2022

Japanese multicenter registry evaluating the antegrade dissection reentry with cardiac computerized tomography for chronic coronary total occlusion.

Maoto Habara, Etsuo Tsuchikane, Kazuki Shimizu, Yoshifumi Kashima, Kenichiro Shimoji, Shigeru Nakamura, Takeshi Niizeki, Takaki Tsutsumi, Yoshiaki Ito, Tomohiro Kawasaki and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Maoto HabaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toyohashi Heart Center, 21-1 Gobudori, Oyama-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8530, Japan. habara@heart-center.or.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5905-9715
Etsuo TsuchikaneDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Toyohashi Heart Center, 21-1 Gobudori, Oyama-cho, Toyohashi, Aichi, 441-8530, Japan.
Kazuki ShimizuDepartment of Radiology, Toyohashi Heart Center, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan.
Yoshifumi KashimaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sapporo CardioVascular Clinic, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kenichiro ShimojiDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Shigeru NakamuraDepartment of Cardiology, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi NiizekiDepartment of Cardiology, Okitama Public General Hospital, Yamagata, Japan.
Takaki TsutsumiDepartment of Cardiology, Saga Medical Center Kouseikan, Saga, Japan.
Yoshiaki ItoDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama-City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Tomohiro KawasakiDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center Shin-Koga Hospital, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
Bridge point Club Japan
Toyohashi Heart Center · JPKoga Hospital · JPKyoto Katsura Hospital · JPSaga-Ken Medical Centre Koseikan · JPSaiseikai Utsunomiya hospital · JPSaiseikai Yokohama Eastern Hospital · JPSapporo Science Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, antegrade dissection re-entry (ADR) with re-entry device for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved to become one of the pillar techniques of the hybrid algorithm. Although the success rate of the device is high, it could be improved. We sought to evaluate the current trends and issues associated with ADR in Japan and evaluate the potential of cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for ADR procedure. A total 48 patients with CTO suitable for ADR evaluated by baseline conventional angiography and CCTA were enrolled. Procedural success and technical success were evaluated as the primary and secondary observations. Furthermore, all puncture points were analyzed by CCTA. CT score at each punctured site depended on the location of plaque deposition (none; + 0, at isolated myocardial site; + 1, at epicardial site; + 2) and the presence of calcification (none; + 0, presence; + 1) was analyzed and calculated (score 0-3). Overall procedure success rate was 95.8%. Thirty-two cases were attempted with the ADR procedure and 25 cases of them were successful. The technical success rate was 78.1% and myocardial infarction or other major complications were not observed in any cases. CT score at 60 puncture sites in 32 cases were analyzed and the score at technical success points was significantly smaller compared to that at technical failure points (0.68 ± 1.09 vs 1.77 ± 1.09, p < 0.0001). CTO-PCI with Stingray device in Japan could achieve a high procedure success and technical success rate. Pre procedure cardiac CT evaluation might support ADR procedure for appropriate patient selection or puncture site selection.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChronic DiseaseComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyDissectionHumansJapanRegistriesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntegrade dissection reentryCardiac computed tomography angiographyChronic total occlusion

Identifiers

PMID33550529
PMCPMC8789703
OpenAlexW3127406058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.