ArticleHeart and vessels2021
Influence of different physiological hemodynamics on fractional flow reserve values in the left coronary artery and right coronary artery.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Vessel-Specific Analysis of Deferred Lesions Using the Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Clinical Significance of Coronary Arterial Dominance: A Review of the Literature.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Review
- Factors Predicting 150 and 200 Microgram Adenosine Requirement during Four Increasing Doses of Intracoronary Adenosine Bolus Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the left coronary artery (LCA) has a flow profile in that most blood flow occurs during diastole rather than systole, the right coronary artery (RCA) has a flow pattern that is less diastolic dominant. This study assessed whether coronary pressure waveforms distal to stenoses with the same fractional flow reserve (FFR) was the same between the LCA and RCA.
methodsA total of 347 vessels from 318 patients who underwent FFR measurements were included. Conventional FFR was calculated as the ratio of the mean coronary distal pressure (Pd) to the mean aortic pressure (Pa) at maximal hyperemia. The pressure drop ratios in systole (PDR
resultsAnalysis of covariance of the regression line of correlation between conventional FFR and PDR
conclusionsThe pressure waveform distal to the stenosis differs between the LCA and RCA. In the LCA, the decrease in diastolic pressure mainly contributed to the drop in FFR, whereas in the RCA, it was the decrease in systolic pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33550427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.