Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550261›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Determinants of contraceptive use among sexually active unmarried adolescent girls and young women aged 15-24 years in Ghana: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.

Felix Boakye Oppong, Divine Darlington Logo, Senyo Yao Agbedra, Anthony Agyapong Adomah, Seidu Amenyaglo, Kingsley Arhin-Wiredu, Samuel Afari-Asiedu, Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contraceptive use and counselling in women with mental illness: KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Felix Boakye OppongGlobal Statistical Institute, Techiman, Ghana atomistic4u@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3146-9958
Divine Darlington LogoResearch and Development Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Senyo Yao AgbedraSunyani Municipal Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Sunyani, Ghana.
Anthony Agyapong AdomahGlobal Statistical Institute, Techiman, Ghana.
Seidu AmenyagloDepartment of Global and International Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kingsley Arhin-WireduSunyani Municipal Health Directorate, Ghana Health Service, Sunyani, Ghana.
Samuel Afari-AsieduKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-NgibiseKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.
Ghana Health Service · GHKintampo Health Research Centre · GHKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThere is a decline in contraceptive use among sexually active unmarried young women in Ghana. This study assessed the prevalence of contraceptive knowledge and use, and the determinant of contraceptive use among sexually active unmarried young women in Ghana.

designThis was a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, using data from the 2017 Ghana Maternal Health Survey. Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the association between background and obstetric characteristics of young women and contraceptive use.

settingGhana.

participantsA total of 809 sexually active unmarried adolescent girls (15-19 years) and young women (20-24 years). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Knowledge and use of both modern and traditional contraceptive methods.

resultsKnowledge of at least one modern and traditional contractive method was 99.8% and 95.0%, respectively. The prevalence of contraceptive use was 43%-with 34% modern and 9% traditional methods. From the unadjusted analyses, age (p=0.002), past pregnancy (p<0.001), abortion in the past 5 years (p=0.007) and history of childbirth (p=0.025) were independently associated with contraceptive use, whereas education (p=0.072), place of residence (p=0.702), household wealth (p=0.836) and age at first sex (p=0.924) were not independently associated with contraceptive use. In the adjusted analysis, contraceptive use was significantly higher among respondents with secondary education compared with those with primary education (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.31 to 4.49, p=0.017), and was higher among respondents with a history of pregnancy (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.06, p<0.001).

conclusionThere is a significant gap between knowledge and use of contraceptives among the study population. While intensifying knowledge of adolescents and young women on contraceptives, adolescent-friendly corners should be established at vantage points to increase utilisation and to prevent societal stigma on young women who access contraceptives services.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsSingle PersonAdolescentAdultChild, PreschoolContraceptionContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGhanaHumansPregnancySexual BehaviorYoung AdultContraceptive Agentspreventive medicinereproductive medicinesexual medicine

Identifiers

PMID33550261
PMCPMC7925931
OpenAlexW3128001951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.