Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550256›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Diverse perspectives on hospitalisation events among people with dementia: protocol for a multisite qualitative study.

Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Quinton Cotton, Jennifer Morgan, Laura Block

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emergency department utilization and presenting chief complaints by Veterans living with dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiNursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA algilmore@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4930-3558
Quinton CottonNursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jennifer MorganNursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Laura BlockNursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG062715 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CYNTHIA M CARLSSON · 2019 to 2026
$34.5M
Training & Education to Advance Minorities in Science (TEAM-Science)R25GM083252 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BIRD, IAN M. · 2008 to 2021
$8.5M
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Medicare's 30-Day Rehospitalization Policy: Eliminating Rehospitalization Disparities by Informing Policy Design and ImplementationR01MD010243 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KIND, AMY J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Novel Approaches to Identifying and Engaging Disadvantaged Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) in Clinical ResearchK76AG060005 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GILMORE-BYKOVSKYI, ANDREA L · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG060005NIA NIH HHS P30 AG062715NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM083252NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD010243
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople living with dementia (PLWD) are more likely to experience hospitalisation events (hospitalisation, rehospitalisation) than those without dementia. Many hospitalisation events, particularly rehospitalisation within 30 days of discharge, are thought to be avoidable. Yet our understanding of dementia-specific risk and protective factors surrounding avoidable hospitalisation is limited to specific intersetting transitions and predominantly clinician perspectives. Broader insights are needed to design accessible and effective solutions for reducing avoidable hospitalisations. We have designed the Stakeholders Understanding of Prevention Protection and Opportunities to Reduce HospiTalizations (SUPPORT) Study to address these gaps. The objectives of the SUPPORT Study are to elicit and examine family caregiver, community and hospital providers' perspectives on avoidable hospitalisation events among PLWD, and to identify opportunities for effective prevention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a multisite, descriptive qualitative study to interview around 100 family caregivers, community and hospital providers. We will identify and sample from regions and communities with higher socio-contextual disadvantage and hospital utilisation, and will aim to recruit individuals representing diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. Interviews will follow a descriptive qualitative design in conjunction with constant comparison techniques to sample divergent situations and events. We will employ a range of analytical approaches to address specific research questions including thematic (inductive and deductive), comparative and dimensional analysis. Interviews will be conducted individually or in focus groups and follow a semistructured interview guide. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the University of Wisconsin-Madison Institutional Review Board. Informed consent procedures will incorporate steps to evaluate capacity to provide informed consent in the event that participants express concerns with thinking or memory or demonstrate challenges recalling study details during the consent process to ensure capacity to consent to participation. A series of publicly available reports, seminars and symposia will be undertaken in collaboration with collaborating organisation partners.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaFocus GroupsHospitalizationHumansQualitative Researchdementiahealth policyprotocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID33550256
PMCPMC7925923
OpenAlexW3128300118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.