Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550240›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Psychometric properties and use of the DEMQOL suite of instruments in research: a systematic review protocol.

Matthias Hoben, Stephanie A Chamberlain, Hannah M O'Rourke, Brittany Elliott, Shovana Shrestha, Rashmi Devkota, Trina Thorne, Jenny Lam, Sube Banerjee, Laura Hughes and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthias HobenFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada mhoben@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-3465-315X
Stephanie A ChamberlainFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Hannah M O'RourkeFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Brittany ElliottFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shovana ShresthaFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Rashmi DevkotaFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Trina ThorneFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jenny LamFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health and Human Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Laura HughesCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-7053
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Alberta · CABrighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDementia is a public health issue and a major risk factor for poor quality of life among older adults. In the absence of a cure, enhancing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of people with dementia is the primary goal of care. Robust measurement of HRQoL is a prerequisite to effective improvement. The DEMQOL suite of instruments is considered among the best available to measure HRQoL in people with dementia; however, no review has systematically and comprehensively examined the use of the DEMQOL in research and summarised evidence to determine its feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness for use in research and practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will systematically search 12 electronic databases and reference lists of all included studies. We will include systematically conducted reviews, as well as, quantitative and qualitative research studies that report on the development, validation or use in research studies of any of the DEMQOL instruments. Two reviewers will independently screen all studies for eligibility, and assess the quality of each included study using one of four validated checklists appropriate for different study designs. Discrepancies at all stages of the review will be resolved by consensus. We will use descriptive statistics (frequencies, proportions, ranges), content analysis of narrative data and vote counting (for the measures of association) to summarise the data elements. Using narrative synthesis, we will summarise what is known about the development, validation, feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness and use of the DEMQOL. Our review methods will follow the reporting and conduct guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this project does not involve primary data collection. We will disseminate our findings through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020157851.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeResearch DesignChecklistConsensusMeta-Analysis as TopicPsychometricsSystematic Reviews as Topicdementiageriatric medicinequality in health care

Identifiers

PMID33550240
PMCPMC7925918
OpenAlexW3127444449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.