Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550034›Full record

SynthesisTissue & cell2021

Clinically relevant cell culture models and their significance in isolation, pathogenesis, vaccine development, repurposing and screening of new drugs for SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review.

Subodh Kumar, Phulen Sarma, Hardeep Kaur, Manisha Prajapat, Anusuya Bhattacharyya, Pramod Avti, Nishant Sehkhar, Harpinder Kaur, Seema Bansal, Saniya Mahendiratta and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tissue & cell, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Interactions of SARS-CoV-2 with Human Target Cells-A Metabolic View.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Subodh KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: subodhbiotech@gmail.com.
Phulen SarmaDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: phulen10@gmail.com.
Hardeep KaurDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: aspireachieve.shine@gmail.com.
Manisha PrajapatDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: manisha.monu25@gmail.com.
Anusuya BhattacharyyaOphthalmology, GMCH-32, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: anusuya.8k@gmail.com.
Pramod AvtiDepartment of Biophysics, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: pramod.avti@gmail.com.
Nishant SehkharDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: nishantmessi88@gmail.com.
Harpinder KaurDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: harpinder8910@gmail.com.
Seema BansalDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: 2006.seema@gmail.com.
Saniya MahendirattaDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: saniya.mahendiratta88@gmail.com.
Vidya M MahalmaniDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: vidyapattanshetti88@gmail.com.
Harvinder SinghDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: harvindermaan4@gmail.com.
Ajay PrakashDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: ajayprakashpgi@gmail.com.
Anurag KuhadUniversity Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS). Panjab University, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: anurag.kuhad@gmail.com.
Bikash MedhiDepartment of Pharmacology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: drbikashus@yahoo.com.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INPanjab University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn-Vitro/Cellular evidence is the backbone and vital proof of concept during the development of novel therapeutics as well as drugs repurposing against COVID-19. Choosing an ideal in-vitro model is vital as the virus entry is through ACE2, CD147, and TMPRSS2 dependant and very specific. In this regard, this is the first systematic review addressing the importance of specific cell lines used as potential in-vitro models in the isolation, pathogenesis, and therapeutics for SARS-COV-2.

methodsWe searched 17 literature databases with appropriate keywords, and identified 1173 non-duplicate studies. In the present study, 71 articles are included after a careful, thorough screening of the titles and their abstracts for possible inclusion using predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria (PRISMA Guidelines).

resultsIn the current study, we compiled cell culture-based studies for SARS-CoV-2 and found the best compatible In-Vitro models for SARS-CoV-2 (Vero, VeroE6, HEK293 as well as its variants, Huh-7, Calu-3 2B4, and Caco2). Among other essential cell lines used include LLC-MK2, MDCKII, BHK-21, HepG2, A549,T cell leukemia (MT-2), stems cells based cell line DYR0100for differentiation assays, and embryo-specific NIH3T3 cell line for vaccine production.

conclusionThe Present study provides a detailed summary of all the drugs/compounds screened for drug repurposing and discovery purpose using the in-vitro models for SARS-CoV-2 along with isolation, pathogenesis and vaccine production. This study also suggests that after careful evaluation of all the cell line based studies, Kidney cells (VeroE6, HEK293 along with their clones), liver Huh-7cells, respiratory Calu-3 cells, and intestinal Caco-2 are the most widely used in-vitro models for SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AnimalsAntiviral AgentsCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCOVID-19 VaccinesDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningHumansAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19 VaccinesACE-2Cell line modelsDrugs repurposingIn-vitro modelsSARS-CoV-2TMPRSS-2

Identifiers

PMID33550034
PMCPMC7836970
OpenAlexW3121850758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.