Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33550008›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2021

3D Registration of pre-surgical prostate MRI and histopathology images via super-resolution volume reconstruction.

Rewa R Sood, Wei Shao, Christian Kunder, Nikola C Teslovich, Jeffrey B Wang, Simon J C Soerensen, Nikhil Madhuripan, Anugayathri Jawahar, James D Brooks, Pejman Ghanouni and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Super-resolution of biomedical volumes with 2D supervision.Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Workshops · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rewa R SoodDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 350 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Wei ShaoDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Christian KunderDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Nikola C TeslovichDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Jeffrey B WangStanford School of Medicine, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Simon J C SoerensenDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Nikhil MadhuripanDepartment of Radiology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Anugayathri JawaharLoyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
James D BrooksDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Pejman GhanouniDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Richard E FanDepartment of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Geoffrey A SonnDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Urology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mirabela RusuDepartment of Radiology, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: mirabela.rusu@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USAarhus University Hospital · DKLoyola University Medical Center · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Stanford Molecular and Cellular Characterization LaboratoryU01CA196387 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BROOKS, JAMES D. · 2015 to 2020
$5.2M
Predoctoral Training in Biomedical Imaging at Stanford UniversityT32EB009653 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BUTTS-PAULY, KIM · 2010 to 2019
$2.1M
Whole-Brain Oscillatory and Behavioral Responses to Noninvasive Local Ketamine Uncaging in the Medial Prefrontal CortexF30MH119763 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, JEFFREY BOND · 2020 to 2021
$75k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA196387NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009653NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH119763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment is increasing rapidly. However, identifying the presence and extent of cancer on MRI remains challenging, leading to high variability in detection even among expert radiologists. Improvement in cancer detection on MRI is essential to reducing this variability and maximizing the clinical utility of MRI. To date, such improvement has been limited by the lack of accurately labeled MRI datasets. Data from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy enables the spatial alignment of digitized histopathology images of the resected prostate with corresponding pre-surgical MRI. This alignment facilitates the delineation of detailed cancer labels on MRI via the projection of cancer from histopathology images onto MRI. We introduce a framework that performs 3D registration of whole-mount histopathology images to pre-surgical MRI in three steps. First, we developed a novel multi-image super-resolution generative adversarial network (miSRGAN), which learns information useful for 3D registration by producing a reconstructed 3D MRI. Second, we trained the network to learn information between histopathology slices to facilitate the application of 3D registration methods. Third, we registered the reconstructed 3D histopathology volumes to the reconstructed 3D MRI, mapping the extent of cancer from histopathology images onto MRI without the need for slice-to-slice correspondence. When compared to interpolation methods, our super-resolution reconstruction resulted in the highest PSNR relative to clinical 3D MRI (32.15 dB vs 30.16 dB for BSpline interpolation). Moreover, the registration of 3D volumes reconstructed via super-resolution for both MRI and histopathology images showed the best alignment of cancer regions when compared to (1) the state-of-the-art RAPSODI approach, (2) volumes that were not reconstructed, or (3) volumes that were reconstructed using nearest neighbor, linear, or BSpline interpolations. The improved 3D alignment of histopathology images and MRI facilitates the projection of accurate cancer labels on MRI, allowing for the development of improved MRI interpretation schemes and machine learning models to automatically detect cancer on MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleGenerative adversarial networksMapping cancer from histopathology images onto MRIRadiology pathology fusionSuper-resolution registration

Identifiers

PMID33550008
PMCPMC7933126
OpenAlexW3123817138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.