Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33549098›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Evaluation of health system readiness and coverage of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants (IPTi) in Kambia district to inform national scale-up in Sierra Leone.

Maria Lahuerta, Roberta Sutton, Anthony Mansaray, Oliver Eleeza, Brigette Gleason, Adewale Akinjeji, Mohamed F Jalloh, Mame Toure, Getachew Kassa, Steven R Meshnick and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Threat of Vector-Borne Diseases in Sierra Leone.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria LahuertaICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA. ml2842@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9748-9273
Roberta SuttonICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Anthony MansarayICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Oliver EleezaICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Brigette GleasonUnited States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Adewale AkinjejiICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Mohamed F JallohImmunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Mame ToureICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Getachew KassaICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Steven R MeshnickDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Molly Deutsch-FeldmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lauren ParmleyICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Michael FriedmanUnited States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Samuel Juana SmithNational Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
Miriam RabkinICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, USA.
Laura SteinhardtMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
ICAP Global HealthCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USMinistry of Health and Sanitation · SL

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U19 GH001581United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention U19GH001581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntermittent preventive treatment of malaria in infants (IPTi) with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) is a proven strategy to protect infants against malaria. Sierra Leone is the first country to implement IPTi nationwide. IPTi implementation was evaluated in Kambia, one of two initial pilot districts, to assess quality and coverage of IPTi services.

methodsThis mixed-methods evaluation had two phases, conducted 3 (phase 1) and 15-17 months (phase 2) after IPTi implementation. Methods included: assessments of 18 health facilities (HF), including register data abstraction (phases 1 and 2); a knowledge, attitudes and practices survey with 20 health workers (HWs) in phase 1; second-generation sequencing of SP resistance markers (pre-IPTi and phase 2); and a cluster-sample household survey among caregivers of children aged 3-15 months (phase 2). IPTi and vaccination coverage from the household survey were calculated from child health cards and maternal recall and weighted for the complex sampling design. Interrupted time series analysis using a Poisson regression model was used to assess changes in malaria cases at HF before and after IPTi implementation.

resultsMost HWs (19/20) interviewed had been trained on IPTi; 16/19 reported feeling well prepared to administer it. Nearly all HFs (17/18 in phase 1; 18/18 in phase 2) had SP for IPTi in stock. The proportion of parasite alleles with dhps K540E mutations increased but remained below the 50% WHO-recommended threshold for IPTi (4.1% pre-IPTi [95%CI 2-7%]; 11% post-IPTi [95%CI 8-15%], p < 0.01). From the household survey, 299/459 (67.4%) children ≥ 10 weeks old received the first dose of IPTi (versus 80.4% for second pentavalent vaccine, given simultaneously); 274/444 (62.5%) children ≥ 14 weeks old received the second IPTi dose (versus 65.4% for third pentavalent vaccine); and 83/217 (36.4%) children ≥ 9 months old received the third IPTi dose (versus 52.2% for first measles vaccine dose). HF register data indicated no change in confirmed malaria cases among infants after IPTi implementation.

conclusionsKambia district was able to scale up IPTi swiftly and provide necessary health systems support. The gaps between IPTi and childhood vaccine coverage need to be further investigated and addressed to optimize the success of the national IPTi programme.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntimalarialsDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHealth Systems PlansHumansInfantInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMalariaMaleMiddle AgedSierra LeoneYoung AdultAntimalarialsCoverageEvaluationHousehold surveyInfantsIPTiMalariaNational scale-upSierra Leone

Identifiers

PMID33549098
PMCPMC7866768
OpenAlexW3127135636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.