Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33549059›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2021

Barriers and facilitators for shared decision making in older patients with multiple chronic conditions: a systematic review.

Ruth E Pel-Littel, Marjolein Snaterse, Nelly Marela Teppich, Bianca M Buurman, Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin, Julia C M van Weert, Mirella M Minkman, Wilma J M Scholte Op Reimer

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Exploring motivations and resistances for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: A systematic review based on a structure-process-outcome model.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Shared Decision-Making and Patient Enablement in Outpatient Rehabilitation: An Observational Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruth E Pel-LittelVilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands. r.pel@vilans.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-4618-3837
Marjolein SnaterseACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Nelly Marela TeppichVilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands.
Bianca M BuurmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatric Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Faridi S van Etten-JamaludinMedical Library, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Julia C M van WeertAmsterdam School of Communication Research/ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mirella M MinkmanVilans, Centre of Expertise for Long-term Care, PO Box 8228, Utrecht, RE, 3503, the Netherlands.
Wilma J M Scholte Op ReimerACHIEVE, Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

ZonMw 520002002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to describe barriers and facilitators for shared decision making (SDM) as experienced by older patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs), informal caregivers and health professionals.

methodsA structured literature search was conducted with 5 databases. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for eligibility and performed a quality assessment. The results from the included studies were summarized using a predefined taxonomy.

resultsOur search yielded 3838 articles. Twenty-eight studies, listing 149 perceived barriers and 67 perceived facilitators for SDM, were included. Due to poor health and cognitive and/or physical impairments, older patients with MCCs participate less in SDM. Poor interpersonal skills of health professionals are perceived as hampering SDM, as do organizational barriers, such as pressure for time and high turnover of patients. However, among older patients with MCCs, SDM could be facilitated when patients share information about personal values, priorities and preferences, as well as information about quality of life and functional status. Informal caregivers may facilitate SDM by assisting patients with decision support, although informal caregivers can also complicate the SDM process, for example, when they have different views on treatment or the patient's capability to be involved. Coordination of care when multiple health professionals are involved is perceived as important.

conclusionsAlthough poor health is perceived as a barrier to participate in SDM, the personal experience of living with MCCs is considered valuable input in SDM. An explicit invitation to participate in SDM is important to older adults. Health professionals need a supporting organizational context and good communication skills to devise an individualized approach for patient care.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedMultiple Chronic ConditionsAgedCaregiversDecision MakingHumansPatient ParticipationQuality of LifeCommunicationInformal caregiversParticipationPersonal experiencePreferences

Identifiers

PMID33549059
PMCPMC7866443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.