Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33548194›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2021

Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy adults aged 60 years and older: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.

Zhiwei Wu, Yaling Hu, Miao Xu, Zhen Chen, Wanqi Yang, Zhiwei Jiang, Minjie Li, Hui Jin, Guoliang Cui, Panpan Chen and 5 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 338 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
338citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
35.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04383574 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial, to Evaluate Safety and Immunogenicity of Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell), in Healthy Elderly Aged 60 Years and Above

TypeinterventionalSponsorSinovac Life Sciences Co., Ltd.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled422ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsTwo doses of medium dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of high dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of placebo at the schedule of day 0,28, Two doses of low dosage inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at the schedule of day 0,28
NCT05026879 completednot on this map

Adverse Events Report of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine From 4040 Healthcare Workers

TypeobservationalSponsorBozyaka Training and Research HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled4,040ConditionsCOVID-19, Vaccine Adverse ReactionArmsInactivated COVID-19 vaccine (CoronaVac)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

338 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 574 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Immunogenicity and Safety of the COVID-19 Vaccines Compared With Control in Healthy Adults: A Qualitative and Systematic Review.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

278 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zhiwei WuHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Yaling HuSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Miao XuNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Zhen ChenNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Wanqi YangSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Zhiwei JiangBeijing Key Tech Statistics Technology, Beijing, China.
Minjie LiHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Hui JinRenqiu City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Renqiu, Hebei, China.
Guoliang CuiSinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China.
Panpan ChenRenqiu City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Renqiu, Hebei, China.
Lei WangSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China.
Guoqing ZhaoBeijing Key Tech Statistics Technology, Beijing, China.
Yuzhu DingRenqiu City Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Renqiu, Hebei, China.
Yuliang ZhaoHebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China. Electronic address: yuliang_zh1@163.com.
Weidong YinSinovac Biotech, Beijing, China. Electronic address: yinwd@sinovac.com.
Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNSinovac Biotech · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA vaccine against COVID-19 is urgently needed for older adults, in whom morbidity and mortality due to the disease are increased. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a candidate COVID-19 vaccine, CoronaVac, containing inactivated SARS-CoV-2, in adults aged 60 years and older.

methodsWe did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial of CoronaVac in healthy adults aged 60 years and older in Renqiu (Hebei, China). Vaccine or placebo was given by intramuscular injection in two doses (days 0 and 28). Phase 1 comprised a dose-escalation study, in which participants were allocated to two blocks: block 1 (3 μg inactivated virus in 0·5 mL of aluminium hydroxide solution per injection) and block 2 (6 μg per injection). Within each block, participants were randomly assigned (2:1) using block randomisation to receive CoronaVac or placebo (aluminium hydroxide solution only). In phase 2, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1) using block randomisation to receive either CoronaVac at 1·5 μg, 3 μg, or 6 μg per dose, or placebo. All participants, investigators, and laboratory staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary safety endpoint was adverse reactions within 28 days after each injection in all participants who received at least one dose. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was seroconversion rate at 28 days after the second injection (which was assessed in all participants who had received the two doses of vaccine according to their random assignment, had antibody results available, and did not violate the trial protocol). Seroconversion was defined as a change from seronegative at baseline to seropositive for neutralising antibodies to live SARS-CoV-2 (positive cutoff titre 1/8), or a four-fold titre increase if the participant was seropositive at baseline. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04383574).

findingsBetween May 22 and June 1, 2020, 72 participants (24 in each intervention group and 24 in the placebo group; mean age 65·8 years [SD 4·8]) were enrolled in phase 1, and between June 12 and June 15, 2020, 350 participants were enrolled in phase 2 (100 in each intervention group and 50 in the placebo group; mean age 66·6 years [SD 4·7] in 349 participants). In the safety populations from both phases, any adverse reaction within 28 days after injection occurred in 20 (20%) of 100 participants in the 1·5 μg group, 25 (20%) of 125 in the 3 μg group, 27 (22%) of 123 in the 6 μg group, and 15 (21%) of 73 in the placebo group. All adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity and injection site pain (39 [9%] of 421 participants) was the most frequently reported event. As of Aug 28, 2020, eight serious adverse events, considered unrelated to vaccination, have been reported by seven (2%) participants. In phase 1, seroconversion after the second dose was observed in 24 of 24 participants (100·0% [95% CI 85·8-100·0]) in the 3 μg group and 22 of 23 (95·7% [78·1-99·9]) in the 6 μg group. In phase 2, seroconversion was seen in 88 of 97 participants in the 1·5 μg group (90·7% [83·1-95·7]), 96 of 98 in the 3 μg group (98·0% [92·8-99·8]), and 97 of 98 (99·0% [94·5-100·0]) in the 6 μg group. There were no detectable antibody responses in the placebo groups.

interpretationCoronaVac is safe and well tolerated in older adults. Neutralising antibody titres induced by the 3 μg dose were similar to those of the 6 μg dose, and higher than those of the 1·5 μg dose, supporting the use of the 3 μg dose CoronaVac in phase 3 trials to assess protection against COVID-19.

fundingChinese National Key Research and Development Program and Beijing Science and Technology Program.

Indexed as

AgedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationChinaCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2SeroconversionVaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID33548194
PMCPMC7906628
OpenAlexW3128702325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.