Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33548060›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical investigation2021

Exercise testing in COVID-19 era: Clinical profile, results and feasibility wearing a facemask.

Cayetana Barbeito-Caamaño, Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera, Jesús Peteiro, Domingo López-Vázquez, Martín Quintas-Guzmán, Ariana Varela-Cancelo, Dolores Martínez-Ruiz, Juan Carlos Yañez-Wonenburger, Miriam Piñeiro-Portela, José Manuel Vázquez-Rodríguez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical investigation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06437301 (End Tidal CO2 and Masks), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06437301 nacompletednot on this map

End Tidal CO2 and Masks: Is There a Correlation?

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHRISTUS HealthRan2021 to 2022Enrolled31ConditionsHypercapniaArmsBaseline measure of ETCO2 without mask, Baseline ETCO2 with mask, ETCO2 after 200 meter walk with mask, ETCO2 after 200 meter walk without mask
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cayetana Barbeito-CaamañoUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2646-4703
Alberto Bouzas-MosqueraUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Jesús PeteiroUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Domingo López-VázquezUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Martín Quintas-GuzmánUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Ariana Varela-CanceloUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Dolores Martínez-RuizUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Juan Carlos Yañez-WonenburgerUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
Miriam Piñeiro-PortelaUnidad de Imagen Cardiaca, servicio de Cardiología, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Universidade da Coruña (UDC), A Coruña, Spain.
José Manuel Vázquez-RodríguezCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
Universidade da Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo data are available about whether Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have led to changes in clinical profiles or results of exercise testing once the usual activity was reassumed, as well as if wearing a facemask has any impact on the tests. The aim of this study is to evaluate differences in the patients referred to exercise stress testing in the context of COVID-19 pandemic and analyse the feasibility and results of these tests wearing a facemask.

methodsWe included all patients referred for an exercise test from 1 June to 30 September 2020 and compared them with the patients attended within the same period in 2019 before and after propensity score matching. All patients referred in 2020 wore a facemask.

resultsA total of 854 patients were included: 398 in the 2020 group and 456 in 2019. No significant differences in baseline characteristics of the patients were observed, with the exception of dyspnoea, which was nearly twice as high in 2020 as compared with 2019. Regarding the results of the tests, no differences were observed, with almost 80% of maximal tests, similar functional capacity and over a 20% of positive exercise tests in both groups. These results remained after propensity score matching.

conclusionCOVID-19 pandemic has not changed the clinical profile of patients referred to exercise testing. In addition, performing exercise testing wearing a facemask is feasible, with no influence in functional capacity and clinical results.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyMasksAgedCOVID-19Echocardiography, StressExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleHumansMaleMetabolic EquivalentMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPhysical Functional PerformancePropensity ScoreReferral and ConsultationCOVID-19exercise testingfacemaskfunctional capacityischaemic cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID33548060
PMCPMC7995065
OpenAlexW3129166539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.