Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33548021›Full record

ArticleDiabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders2021

Impact of Intensive Glucose Control on Brain Health: Meta-Analysis of Cumulative Data from 16,584 Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Xingyao Tang, Marly A Cardoso, Jinkui Yang, Jian-Bo Zhou, Rafael Simó

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Dementia in Diabetes: The Role of Hypoglycemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Metabolic Syndrome and Cognitive Function.Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xingyao TangBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Marly A CardosoDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jinkui YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jian-Bo ZhouDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. jbzhou@ccmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2507-9192
Rafael SimóEndocrinology and Nutrition Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81870556National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82070851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite growing evidence that type 2 diabetes is associated with dementia, the question of whether intensive glucose control can prevent or arrest cognitive decline remains unanswered. In the analysis reported here, we explored the effect of intensive glucose control versus standard care on brain health, including structural abnormalities of the brain (atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, lacunar infarction, and cerebral microbleeds), cognitive dysfunction, and risk of dementia.

methodsWe searched the PubMed and Embase databases, the Web of Science website, and the Clinicaltrial.gov registry for studies published in English prior to July 2020. Only studies with a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design were considered. We analyzed structural abnormalities of the brain (atrophy, white matter hyperintensities, lacunar infarction, and cerebral microbleeds), cognitive function (cognitive impairment, executive function, memory, attention, and information-processing speed), and dementia (Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, and mixed dementia).

resultsSix studies (5 different RCTs) with 16,584 participants were included in this meta-analysis. One study that compared structural changes between groups receiving intensive versus conventional glucose control measures reported non-significant results. The results of the five studies, comprising four cohorts, indicated a significantly poorer decline in cognitive function in the intensive glucose control group (β - 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.05 to - 0.02) than in the conventional glucose control group. Further subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in the change in cognitive performance in composite cognitive function (β - 0.03, 95% CI - 0.05 to - 0.01) and memory (β  - 0.13, 95% CI - 0.25 to - 0.02). One trial evaluated the prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia between groups receiving intensive and conventional glucose control, respectively, and the differences were insignificant.

conclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that intensive glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes can slow down cognitive decline, especially the decline in composite cognition and memory function. However, further studies are necessary to confirm the impact of strict glucose control on structural abnormalities in the brain and the risk of dementia.

Indexed as

Brain healthDiabetesIntensive glucose control

Identifiers

PMID33548021
PMCPMC7947088
OpenAlexW3128987011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.