Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547826›Full record

ArticleThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology2021

Subgenome evolution in allotetraploid plants.

Matteo Schiavinato, Alexandrina Bodrug-Schepers, Juliane C Dohm, Heinz Himmelbauer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Phylogenomics of Southern European Taxa in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. PolyploidFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  17. JLOH: Inferring loss of heterozygosity blocks from sequencing data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo SchiavinatoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Computational Biology, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9323-0280
Alexandrina Bodrug-SchepersDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Computational Biology, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, Austria.
Juliane C DohmDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Computational Biology, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5970-4457
Heinz HimmelbauerDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Institute of Computational Biology, Muthgasse 18, Vienna, 1190, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8897-2928
BOKU University · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polyploidization is a well-known speciation and adaptation mechanism. Traces of former polyploidization events were discovered within many genomes, and especially in plants. Allopolyploidization by interspecific hybridization between two species is common. Among hybrid plants, many are domesticated species of agricultural interest and many of their genomes and of their presumptive parents have been sequenced. Hybrid genomes remain challenging to analyse because of the presence of multiple subgenomes. The genomes of hybrids often undergo rearrangement and degradation over time. Based on 10 hybrid plant genomes from six different genera, with hybridization dating from 10,000 to 5 million years ago, we assessed subgenome degradation, subgenomic intermixing and biased subgenome fractionation. The restructuring of hybrid genomes does not proceed proportionally with the age of the hybrid. The oldest hybrids in our data set display completely different fates: whereas the subgenomes of the tobacco plant Nicotiana benthamiana are in an advanced stage of degradation, the subgenomes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) are exceptionally well conserved by structure and sequence. We observed statistically significant biased subgenome fractionation in seven out of 10 hybrids, which had different ages and subgenomic intermixing levels. Hence, we conclude that no correlation exists between biased fractionation and subgenome intermixing. Lastly, domestication may encourage or hinder subgenome intermixing, depending on the evolutionary context. In summary, comparative analysis of hybrid genomes and their presumptive parents allowed us to determine commonalities and differences between their evolutionary fates. In order to facilitate the future analysis of further hybrid genomes, we automated the analysis steps within manticore, which is publicly available at https://github.com/MatteoSchiavinato/manticore.git.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularTetraploidyBrassicaChenopodium quinoaDomesticationGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticNicotianaPlantsallotetraploidcrop plantdomesticationgenome evolutioninterspecific hybridsubgenome intermixing

Identifiers

PMID33547826
PMCPMC8251528
OpenAlexW3126645137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.