ArticleESC heart failure2021
The impact of frailty according to Clinical Frailty Scale on clinical outcome in patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between natriuretic peptides and C-reactive protein with frailty in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2024Pooled it
- The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) employment in the frailty assessment of patients suffering from Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs): A systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Real-World National Databases Versus Hypothesis-Driven Cohort Studies: A Reply to the Critique on the TURK-HF Registry Design.Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Rationale and Design of the Türkiye Heart Failure (TURK-HF) Registry.Clinical cardiology · 2026Observational
- Hospital Frailty Risk Score Predicts Long-Term Hospital Readmissions in Very Old Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of the Zulfiqar Frailty Scale (ZFS) in primary care: a cross-sectional survey.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Impact of frailty on outcomes after ventricular tachycardia ablation: A prospective observational study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026Observational
- Prevalence and associated factors of frailty in hospitalized elderly patients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Instruments to Measure Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure: a Narrative Review.Current heart failure reports · 2025Review
- Behavioural Cardiology: A Review on an Expanding Field of Cardiology-Holistic Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- The efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients aged over 80 years with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Risk stratification and survival prediction in heart failure: from grades to scores.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Circulation reports · 2024Article
- Long-term prognostic value of the HESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Usefulness of Clinical Frailty Scale for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of Older Heart Failure Patients.Circulation reports · 2024Article
- Association of preoperative clinical frailty and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.Heart and vessels · 2023Article
- Zulfiqar Frailty Scale (ZFS): Concordance Study with the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS).Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Clinical frailty, and not features of acute infection, is associated with late mortality in COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2022Article
- Response by Denfeld et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Characterizing Sex Differences in Physical Frailty Phenotypes in Heart Failure".Circulation. Heart failure · 2022Article
- Sex differences in the impact of frailty in elderly outpatients with heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThere is currently no gold standard in evaluating frailty in patients with heart failure (HF), and the prognostic value of frailty according to the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) on mortality in patients with HF is still unknown. METHODS AND
resultsAmong consecutive 596 patients after their discharge from HF in Kokura Memorial Hospital (Kitakyushu, Japan) during 2015, their frailty at discharge was assessed according to CFS. Patients were classified into three groups: low (N = 232, 38.9%), intermediate (N = 230, 38.6%), and high (N = 134, 22.5%). The primary endpoint was defined as 2 year all-cause death. The mean age was 76.6 ± 10.1 years, and 55.3% were men in entire cohort. There were significant differences in age, living environment, and dementia among low, intermediate, and high CFS groups. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and co-morbidities such as severe renal failure and severe anaemia tended to increase with frailty severity, while body mass index (BMI) and albumin level tended to decrease with frailty severity. Two year cumulative incidences of all-cause death for the three groups were 12.8%, 25.4%, and 52.7% (P < 0.001), respectively. This significant difference in the risk for all-cause death among the CFS groups was driven by the risk for cardiac (8.6%, 14.2%, and 31.0%, respectively, P < 0.001) and non-cardiac death (4.6%, 13.0%, and 31.4%, respectively, P < 0.001). The multivariate analysis showed that high frailty was independently associated with all-cause death (intermediate CFS group: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.43, 95% confidence interval, 0.86-2.36, P = 0.16; high CFS group: adjusted hazard ratio, 3.90, 95% confidence interval, 2.32-6.55, P < 0.001), and this result was consistent, irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, BMI, and LVEF without significant interaction.
conclusionsThe simple CFS tool was successful in predicting the risk for all-cause death in patients with HF, and frailty according to CFS was independently associated with all-cause death irrespective of stratification based on age, sex, BMI, and LVEF without significant interaction. The CFS is a valuable prognostic tool in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.