ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2021
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 235 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
235 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Peripheral vision in real-world tasks: A systematic review.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Pooled it
- Estimating stimulus-processing time via position slopes in visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Learning how: A "mindless" procedure alone gives rise to contextual cueing-A weakly supervised connectionist model of statistical context learning in visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- A single cortical circuit implements fast and slow visual search.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Long-term memory speeds encoding, independently of attention.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Color as a gate to verification: Super-additive costs in oculomotor disengagement.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Redistribution of Gaze Patterns in Facial Localized Scleroderma Following Autologous Fat Transfer: An Eye-Tracking Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Observational
- What Makes Joint Visual Search Efficient? A Distractor Suppression Account.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Decision rules diverge between sympatric Featherfin cichlids despite shared preferences, ecology, and evolutionary history.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Attentional tuning to color in efficient visual search: Evidence for optimal peak shifts and relational asymmetry.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Probabilistic tuning of attentional templates: Evidence for flexible prioritization in visual working memory.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Distractor avoidance is achieved by active control rather than passive exclusion.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Guidance of attention by statistical learning when multiple guidance mechanisms compete.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Spotlight on the past: Focusing attention on long-term memory.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Investigation of Redundant Visual Patterns to Improve Usability of Labels.Human factors · 2026Article
- Parallel or clump-wise serial? A reinterpretation of feature-search mode.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Perceiving surface reflectance requires attention.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Effects of Environmental Clutter, Head-Mounted Display Clutter, and Head-Mounted Display Transparency on Human Efficiency, Safety, and Mental Demand During Navigation.Human factors · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of adapting to novel contexts during the generalization of learned spatial suppression.Journal of vision · 2026Article
175 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper describes Guided Search 6.0 (GS6), a revised model of visual search. When we encounter a scene, we can see something everywhere. However, we cannot recognize more than a few items at a time. Attention is used to select items so that their features can be "bound" into recognizable objects. Attention is "guided" so that items can be processed in an intelligent order. In GS6, this guidance comes from five sources of preattentive information: (1) top-down and (2) bottom-up feature guidance, (3) prior history (e.g., priming), (4) reward, and (5) scene syntax and semantics. These sources are combined into a spatial "priority map," a dynamic attentional landscape that evolves over the course of search. Selective attention is guided to the most active location in the priority map approximately 20 times per second. Guidance will not be uniform across the visual field. It will favor items near the point of fixation. Three types of functional visual field (FVFs) describe the nature of these foveal biases. There is a resolution FVF, an FVF governing exploratory eye movements, and an FVF governing covert deployments of attention. To be identified as targets or rejected as distractors, items must be compared to target templates held in memory. The binding and recognition of an attended object is modeled as a diffusion process taking > 150 ms/item. Since selection occurs more frequently than that, it follows that multiple items are undergoing recognition at the same time, though asynchronously, making GS6 a hybrid of serial and parallel processes. In GS6, if a target is not found, search terminates when an accumulating quitting signal reaches a threshold. Setting of that threshold is adaptive, allowing feedback about performance to shape subsequent searches. Simulation shows that the combination of asynchronous diffusion and a quitting signal can produce the basic patterns of response time and error data from a range of search experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.