Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547598›Full record

SynthesisCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2021

Cognitive Inflexibility in OCD and Related Disorders.

Samuel R Chamberlain, Jeremy E Solly, Roxanne W Hook, Matilde M Vaghi, Trevor W Robbins

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel R ChamberlainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK. src33@cam.ac.uk.
Jeremy E SollyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Roxanne W HookDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Matilde M VaghiMax Planck University College London (UCL) Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, London, UK.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive inflexibility is suggested by the hallmark symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), namely the occurrence of repetitive thoughts and/or behaviours that persist despite being functionally impairing and egodystonic to the individual. As well as being implied by the top-level symptoms, cognitive inflexibility in OCD, and some related conditions, has also been objectively quantified in case-control studies using computerised cognitive tasks. This chapter begins by considering the objective measurement of different aspects of cognitive flexibility using neuropsychological paradigms, with a focus on neural and neurochemical substrates. It moves on to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from a widely deployed flexibility task: the Intra-Dimensional/Extra-Dimensional Set-Shift Task (IDED). By pooling data from 11 studies (335 OCD patients and 311 controls), we show that Extra-Dimensional (ED) shift deficits are a robust and reproducible finding (effect size medium-large) in OCD across the literature, and that this deficit is not attributable to group differences in age or IQ. The OCD ED deficit is then discussed in terms of dysfunction of fronto-striatal pathways (as exemplified, for example, by functional connectivity data), and the putative role of different neurotransmitters. We consider evidence that impaired ED shifting constitutes a candidate vulnerability marker (or 'endophenotype') for OCD. The available literature is then surveyed as to ED findings in other obsessive-compulsive (OC) related disorders (e.g. hoarding, body-dysmorphic disorder, and trichotillomania), as well as in non-OC disorders (schizophrenia and anxiety symptoms in general). Lastly, we consider more recent, emerging developments in the quantification of compulsivity using cognitive tasks and questionnaires, as well as key directions for future research, including the need to refine compulsivity and its composite cognitive processes.

Indexed as

AttentionObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAnxietyCognitionCorpus StriatumHumansCognitive flexibilityCompulsivityEndophenotypeIntra-dimensional/extra-dimensional set-shift taskObsessive-compulsive disorderObsessive-compulsive related disordersOCDSet-shifting

Identifiers

PMID33547598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.