Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547574›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2021

Healthcare Providers' Perceptions on the Timing of Initial Advance Care Planning Discussions in Japan: a Mixed-Methods Study.

Jun Miyashita, Ayako Kohno, Sayaka Shimizu, Motohiro Kashiwazaki, Noriki Kamihiro, Kaoru Okawa, Masami Fujisaki, Shunichi Fukuhara, Yosuke Yamamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jun MiyashitaDepartment of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochikamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, 961-0005, Japan. jun-miya@umin.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-0659
Ayako KohnoInternationalization Promotion Office, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Sayaka ShimizuSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Motohiro KashiwazakiThe Kansai Centre for Family Medicine, Kanai Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriki KamihiroThe Kansai Centre for Family Medicine, Kanai Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Kaoru OkawaDepartment of Home Care Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Chiba, Japan.
Masami FujisakiDepartment of General Medicine, Medical Center Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Shunichi FukuharaDepartment of General Medicine, Shirakawa Satellite for Teaching And Research (STAR), Fukushima Medical University, 2-1 Toyochikamiyajiro, Shirakawa, Fukushima, 961-0005, Japan.
Yosuke YamamotoDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost adult patients are willing to discuss advance care planning before the onset of any illness. There might be differences in preferences for timing when it comes to initiating advance care planning discussions by healthcare providers with patients.

objectiveTo identify healthcare providers' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions in Japan.

designA mixed-methods questionnaire comprising three case scenarios based on three different illness trajectories.

participantsThe study participants were physicians and nurses employed in four community hospitals in Japan. MAIN MEASURES: Percentages of physicians' and nurses' willingness to initiate advance care planning discussions at four stages of patients' illness trajectory were quantitatively determined, and perceptions on preferred timing were qualitatively identified. KEY

resultsFrom 108 physician and 123 nurse respondents (response rate: 99%), 291 physician and 362 nurse responses about three case scenarios were obtained. Overall, 51.2% of physicians and 65.5% of nurses (p < 0.001) accepted discussion before illness. Less than one-third of physicians considered advance care planning a "wise precaution," while about two-thirds of nurses did. Additionally, more than half of both physicians and nurses preferred to postpone advance care planning until the patient's imminent death.

conclusionsPhysicians are less willing than nurses to begin advance care planning discussions before patients' health has deteriorated though most prefer to wait until the patients are close to death. Healthcare providers' attitudes toward advance care planning will need to be addressed to improve rates of completion in Japan.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningPhysiciansHealth PersonnelHumansJapanPerceptionadvance care planninghealthcare providerJapanmixed-methods study

Identifiers

PMID33547574
PMCPMC8481514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.