Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547370›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Differentiation of physical and chemical cross-linking in gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels.

Lisa Rebers, Raffael Reichsöllner, Sophia Regett, Günter E M Tovar, Kirsten Borchers, Stefan Baudis, Alexander Southan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa Rebers *Institute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Raffael Reichsöllner *Christian Doppler Laboratory for Advanced Polymers for Biomaterials and 3D Printing, Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Sophia RegettInstitute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Günter E M TovarInstitute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. guenter.tovar@igvp.uni-stuttgart.de.
Kirsten BorchersInstitute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.
Stefan BaudisChristian Doppler Laboratory for Advanced Polymers for Biomaterials and 3D Printing, Institute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander SouthanInstitute of Interfacial Process Engineering and Plasma Technology, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. alexander.southan@igvp.uni-stuttgart.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gelatin methacryloyl (GM) hydrogels have been investigated for almost 20 years, especially for biomedical applications. Recently, strengthening effects of a sequential cross-linking procedure, whereby GM hydrogel precursor solutions are cooled before chemical cross-linking, were reported. It was hypothesized that physical and enhanced chemical cross-linking of the GM hydrogels contribute to the observed strengthening effects. However, a detailed investigation is missing so far. In this contribution, we aimed to reveal the impact of physical and chemical cross-linking on strengthening of sequentially cross-linked GM and gelatin methacryloyl acetyl (GMA) hydrogels. We investigated physical and chemical cross-linking of three different GM(A) derivatives (GM10, GM2A8 and GM2), which provided systematically varied ratios of side-group modifications. GM10 contained the highest methacryloylation degree (DM), reducing its ability to cross-link physically. GM2 had the lowest DM and showed physical cross-linking. The total modification degree, determining the physical cross-linking ability, of GM2A8 was comparable to that of GM10, but the chemical cross-linking ability was comparable to GM2. At first, we measured the double bond conversion (DBC) kinetics during chemical GM(A) cross-linking quantitatively in real-time via near infrared spectroscopy-photorheology and showed that the DBC decreased due to sequential cross-linking. Furthermore, results of circular dichroism spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry indicated gelation and conformation changes, which increased storage moduli of all GM(A) hydrogels due to sequential cross-linking. The data suggested that the total cross-link density determines hydrogel stiffness, regardless of the physical or chemical nature of the cross-links.

Identifiers

PMID33547370
PMCPMC7864981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.