Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547339›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Genetic and environmental architecture of conscientiousness in adolescence.

Yusuke Takahashi, Anqing Zheng, Shinji Yamagata, Juko Ando

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuke TakahashiGraduate School of Education, Kyoto University, Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 6068501, Japan. takahashi.yusuke.3n@kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-3108-1109
Anqing ZhengDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, USA.
Shinji YamagataGraduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Juko AndoFaculty of Letters, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPKyoto University · JPNagoya University · JPUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a genetically informative design (about 2000 twin pairs), we investigated the phenotypic and genetic and environmental architecture of a broad construct of conscientiousness (including conscientiousness per se, effortful control, self-control, and grit). These four different measures were substantially correlated; the coefficients ranged from 0.74 (0.72-0.76) to 0.79 (0.76-0.80). Univariate genetic analyses revealed that individual differences in conscientiousness measures were moderately attributable to additive genetic factors, to an extent ranging from 62 (58-65) to 64% (61-67%); we obtained no evidence that shared environmental influences were observed. Multivariate genetic analyses showed that for the four measures used to assess conscientiousness, genetic correlations were stronger than the corresponding non-shared environmental correlations, and that a latent common factor accounted for over 84% of the genetic variance. Our findings suggest that individual differences in the four measures of conscientiousness are not distinguishable at both the phenotypic and behavioural genetic levels, and that the overlap was substantially attributable to genetic factors.

Indexed as

PersonalitySelf-ControlAdolescentChildFemaleGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Association StudiesHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPhenotypeTwins

Identifiers

PMID33547339
PMCPMC7864923
OpenAlexW3128257847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.