Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547334›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

An in silico deep learning approach to multi-epitope vaccine design: a SARS-CoV-2 case study.

Zikun Yang, Paul Bogdan, Shahin Nazarian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Designing a novel and effective multi-epitope subunit vaccine against human astrovirus using reverse vaccinology approach.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zikun YangMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Paul BogdanMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. pbogdan@usc.edu.
Shahin NazarianMing Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Funding

Army Research Office W911NF-17-1-0076Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency N66001-17-1-4044National Science Foundation CCF-1837131National Science Foundation CNS-1932620National Science Foundation CPS/CNS-1453860National Science Foundation MCB-1936775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rampant spread of COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, all over the world has led to over millions of deaths, and devastated the social, financial and political entities around the world. Without an existing effective medical therapy, vaccines are urgently needed to avoid the spread of this disease. In this study, we propose an in silico deep learning approach for prediction and design of a multi-epitope vaccine (DeepVacPred). By combining the in silico immunoinformatics and deep neural network strategies, the DeepVacPred computational framework directly predicts 26 potential vaccine subunits from the available SARS-CoV-2 spike protein sequence. We further use in silico methods to investigate the linear B-cell epitopes, Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes (CTL) epitopes, Helper T Lymphocytes (HTL) epitopes in the 26 subunit candidates and identify the best 11 of them to construct a multi-epitope vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 virus. The human population coverage, antigenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, physicochemical properties and secondary structure of the designed vaccine are evaluated via state-of-the-art bioinformatic approaches, showing good quality of the designed vaccine. The 3D structure of the designed vaccine is predicted, refined and validated by in silico tools. Finally, we optimize and insert the codon sequence into a plasmid to ensure the cloning and expression efficiency. In conclusion, this proposed artificial intelligence (AI) based vaccine discovery framework accelerates the vaccine design process and constructs a 694aa multi-epitope vaccine containing 16 B-cell epitopes, 82 CTL epitopes and 89 HTL epitopes, which is promising to fight the SARS-CoV-2 viral infection and can be further evaluated in clinical studies. Moreover, we trace the RNA mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 and ensure that the designed vaccine can tackle the recent RNA mutations of the virus.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesDeep LearningAllergensCodon UsageComputational BiologyCOVID-19Drug DesignEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineModels, MolecularMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMutationProtein ConformationAllergensCOVID-19 VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteRNA, ViralSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Vaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID33547334
PMCPMC7865008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.