Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547269›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2021

Effectiveness of Perineural Injections Combined with Standard Postoperative Total Knee Arthroplasty Protocols in the Management of Chronic Postsurgical Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

İsmail Güzel, Deniz Gül, Serkan Akpancar, John Lyftogt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07381621 (A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Perineural Dextrose and Conventional Local Anesthetic Injections in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07381621 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Evaluation of the Clinical Effectiveness of Perineural Dextrose and Conventional Local Anesthetic Injections in Patients With Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAnkara Training and Research HospitalRan2026 to 2026Enrolled86ConditionsKnee OsteoarthritisArmsPerineural 5% Dextrose Injection, Perineural Local Anesthetic Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perineural local anesthetic treatments for osteoarthritic pain.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

İsmail GüzelDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
Deniz GülDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bursa Kestel State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Serkan AkpancarDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.
John LyftogtPrivate Practice (Retired), Christchurch, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Despite increased experience and technical developments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) remains one of physicians' biggest challenges. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineural injection therapy (PIT) in the management of CPSP after TKA. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 60 patients who had been surgically treated with TKA because of advanced knee osteoarthritis was included in the present study. The study included 2 groups. Group A consisted of patients who received 3 rounds of PIT combined with standard postoperative TKA protocol during the same period. Group B received standard postoperative TKA protocols (rehabilitation programs, oral and intravenous analgesics). Clinical effectiveness was evaluated via Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. RESULTS All repeated measures showed significant improvements (P<0.001) in both groups for VAS and WOMAC scores. These scores were significantly better in group A in all follow-up periods compared with group B (P<0.001). Twenty-nine patients (93.5%) in group A reported excellent or good outcomes compared with 26 patients (89.6%) in group B. CONCLUSIONS PIT is a promising approach in CPSP with minimal cost, simple and secure injection procedures, minimal side effects, and higher clinical efficacy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementPostoperative PainPostoperative PeriodRange of Motion, ArticularStandard of CareTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33547269
PMCPMC7874529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.