Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33547163›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Semantic Knowledge of Famous People and Places Is Represented in Hippocampus and Distinct Cortical Networks.

Neal W Morton, Ellen L Zippi, Sharon M Noh, Alison R Preston

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Semantic encoding of trauma memories in the hippocampus among individuals with PTSD.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Trial
  2. The human hippocampus can pattern separate memories by meaning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. What episodic memory reveals about the default mode network.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sustained neural representations of personally familiar people and places during cued recall.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023
    Article
  17. Proper and common names in the semantic system.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Neal W MortonCenter for Learning & Memory neal.morton@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2631-2710
Ellen L ZippiCenter for Learning & Memory.ORCID 0000-0001-8246-5781
Sharon M NohCenter for Learning & Memory.ORCID 0000-0003-0002-7759
Alison R PrestonCenter for Learning & Memory.ORCID 0000-0003-2706-6862
Institute for Learning and Development · USBoston Center for Memory · US

Funding

Hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory integrationR01MH100121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alison R Preston · 2013 to 2026
$7.3M
A neurocognitive framework for understanding how experience shapes object representationsF32MH114869 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MORTON, NEAL W · 2017 to 2019
$184k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH114869NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies have found that anterior temporal lobe (ATL) is critical for detailed knowledge of object categories, suggesting that it has an important role in semantic memory. However, in addition to information about entities, such as people and objects, semantic memory also encompasses information about places. We tested predictions stemming from the PMAT model, which proposes there are distinct systems that support different kinds of semantic knowledge: an anterior temporal (AT) network, which represents information about entities; and a posterior medial (PM) network, which represents information about places. We used representational similarity analysis to test for activation of semantic features when human participants viewed pictures of famous people and places, while controlling for visual similarity. We used machine learning techniques to quantify the semantic similarity of items based on encyclopedic knowledge in the Wikipedia page for each item and found that these similarity models accurately predict human similarity judgments. We found that regions within the AT network, including ATL and inferior frontal gyrus, represented detailed semantic knowledge of people. In contrast, semantic knowledge of places was represented within PM network areas, including precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, angular gyrus, and parahippocampal cortex. Finally, we found that hippocampus, which has been proposed to serve as an interface between the AT and PM networks, represented fine-grained semantic similarity for both individual people and places. Our results provide evidence that semantic knowledge of people and places is represented separately in AT and PM areas, whereas hippocampus represents semantic knowledge of both categories.

Indexed as

Famous PersonsSemanticsAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologyYoung Adultanterior temporalfMRImachine learningposterior medialRSAsemantic memory

Identifiers

PMID33547163
PMCPMC8018744
OpenAlexW3126476918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.