Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546999›Full record

ReviewSeminars in fetal & neonatal medicine2021

Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement.

Adeline A Boatin, Joseph Ngonzi, Gabriel Ganyaglo, Magatte Mbaye, Blair J Wylie, Khady Diouf

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Maternal morbidity following a trial of labor after cesarean birth: A scoping review of operative vaginal birth compared with cesarean birth in the second stage of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Adeline A BoatinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA; Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Program for Global Surgery and Social Change, USA. Electronic address: adeline_boatin@mgh.harvard.edu.
Joseph NgonziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Gabriel GanyagloDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korle-bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Magatte MbayeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UFR2S, University Gaston Berger, St-Louis, Senegal.
Blair J WylieHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Khady DioufHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA; Division of Global Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Harvard University · USKorle Bu Teaching Hospital · GHMbarara University of Science and Technology · UGUniversité Gaston Berger · SN

Funding

Wireless Physiologic Monitoring in Postpartum Women in rural UgandaK23HD097300 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOATIN, ADELINE ADWOA · 2018 to 2022
$863k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD097300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving quality of care in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) is a global priority, specifically around maternal and newborn care, where mortality and morbidity remain unacceptably high. Cesarean delivery is the most common procedure in women, thus evaluating quality around the provision of this intervention provides insight into overall quality of care around childbirth. In this review we provide an overview on the quality of care around cesarean delivery using the six domains of quality proposed by the Institute of Medicine: equity, effectiveness, efficiency, safety, timeliness and patient-centered care. We review evidence of potential quality gaps in each of these domains around cesarean delivery in LMICs, discuss opportunities for improvement and provide suggestions on metrics for tracking quality in each of these domains. As cesarean delivery rates increase globally, efforts to ensure quality will be essential to drive continued and sustained improvements in global maternal and newborn outcomes.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDeveloping CountriesCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyCesarean deliveryChildbirthLow-and middle-income countriesQuality of careSafety

Identifiers

PMID33546999
PMCPMC8026747
OpenAlexW3122479922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.