Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546771›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2021

The skin microbiome of Xenopus laevis and the effects of husbandry conditions.

Maya Z Piccinni, Joy E M Watts, Marie Fourny, Matt Guille, Samuel C Robson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Commensal skin bacteria interact with the innate immune system to promote tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis tadpoles.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Manipulating the microbiome alters regenerative outcomes in Xenopus laevis tadpoles via lipopolysaccharide signalling.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maya Z PiccinniSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Joy E M WattsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Marie FournyUniversity of Rouen-Normandy, Rouen, France.
Matt GuilleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK.
Samuel C RobsonCentre for Enzyme Innovation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. samuel.robson@port.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-9160
University of Portsmouth · GBUniversité de Rouen Normandie · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (GB) BB/R014841/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/P001009/1Research England E3Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212942/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHistorically the main source of laboratory Xenopus laevis was the environment. The increase in genetically altered animals and evolving governmental constraints around using wild-caught animals for research has led to the establishment of resource centres that supply animals and reagents worldwide, such as the European Xenopus Resource Centre. In the last decade, centres were encouraged to keep animals in a "low microbial load" or "clean" state, where embryos are surface sterilized before entering the housing system; instead of the conventional, "standard" conditions where frogs and embryos are kept without prior surface treatment. Despite Xenopus laevis having been kept in captivity for almost a century, surprisingly little is known about the frogs as a holobiont and how changing the microbiome may affect resistance to disease. This study examines how the different treatment conditions, "clean" and "standard" husbandry in recirculating housing, affects the skin microbiome of tadpoles and female adults. This is particularly important when considering the potential for poor welfare caused by a change in husbandry method as animals move from resource centres to smaller research colonies.

resultsWe found strong evidence for developmental control of the surface microbiome on Xenopus laevis; adults had extremely similar microbial communities independent of their housing, while both tadpole and environmental microbiome communities were less resilient and showed greater diversity.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that the adult Xenopus laevis microbiome is controlled and selected by the host. This indicates that the surface microbiome of adult Xenopus laevis is stable and defined independently of the environment in which it is housed, suggesting that the use of clean husbandry conditions poses little risk to the skin microbiome when transferring adult frogs to research laboratories. This will have important implications for frog health applicable to Xenopus laevis research centres throughout the world.

Indexed as

16S rRNA ampliconCutaneous microbiomeFrog skin microbiotaHusbandryIllumina MiSeqTadpolesXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID33546771
PMCPMC7866774
OpenAlexW3126945578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.