Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546720›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2021

Health care workers' experiences of managing foetal distress and birth asphyxia at health facilities in Northern Uganda.

Elizabeth Ayebare, Grace Ndeezi, Anna Hjelmstedt, Jolly Nankunda, James K Tumwine, Claudia Hanson, Wibke Jonas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth AyebareDepartment of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda. eayebare@chs.mak.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5636-5258
Grace NdeeziDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Anna HjelmstedtDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jolly NankundaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
James K TumwineMulago Specialized Women's and Neonatal Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Claudia HansonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Wibke JonasDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEMakerere University · UGMulago Hospital · UG

Funding

Makerere-Sweden Bilateral Research Program 5180060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBirth asphyxia is one of the leading causes of intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality worldwide. We sought to explore the experiences of health care workers in managing foetal distress and birth asphyxia to gain an understanding of the challenges in a low-income setting.

methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews with 12 midwives and 4 doctors working in maternity units from different health facilities in Northern Uganda in 2018. We used a semi-structured interview guide which included questions related to; health care workers' experiences of maternity care, care for foetal distress and birth asphyxia, views on possible preventive actions and perspectives of the community. Audio recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using inductive content analysis.

resultsFour categories emerged: (i) Understanding of and actions for foetal distress and birth asphyxia including knowledge, misconception and interventions; (ii) Challenges of managing foetal distress and birth asphyxia such as complexities of the referral system, refusal of referral, lack of equipment, and human resource problems, (iii) Expectations and blame from the community, and finally (iv) Health care worker' insights into prevention of foetal distress and birth asphyxia.

conclusionHealth care workers described management of foetal distress and birth asphyxia as complex and challenging. Thus, guidelines to manage foetal distress and birth asphyxia that are specifically tailored to the different levels of health facilities to ensure high quality of care and reduction of need for referral are called for. Innovative ways to operationalise transportation for referral and community dialogues could lead to improved birth experiences and outcomes.

Indexed as

ResuscitationAdultAsphyxia NeonatorumFemaleFetal DistressHealth FacilitiesHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal Health ServicesMiddle AgedNurse MidwivesPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyUgandaBirth asphyxiaFoetal distressHealthcare workersLow income settingMidwivesReferral systems

Identifiers

PMID33546720
PMCPMC7866477
OpenAlexW3110057321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.