Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546612›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2021

Care homes, their communities, and resilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: interim findings from a qualitative study.

Fiona Marshall, Adam Gordon, John R F Gladman, Simon Bishop

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05341271 (The Effect of Digital Reminiscence Therapy on People With Mild and Moderate Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05341271 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Digital Reminiscence Therapy on People With Mild and Moderate Dementia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled186ConditionsDementiaArmsExperimental: digital reminiscence group (DRG), Experimental: general reminiscence group (GRG)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on nursing home professionals: results of the RESICOVID project.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona MarshallNIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK. Fiona.marshall2@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1512-4271
Adam GordonNIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-9853
John R F GladmanNIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8506-7786
Simon BishopNottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-7081
University of Nottingham · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrom late February 2020, English care homes rapidly adapted their practices in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to accommodating new guidelines and policies, staff had to adjust to rapid reconfiguration of services external to the home that they would normally depend upon for support. This study examined the complex interdependencies of support as staff responded to COVID-19. The aim was to inform more effective responses to the ongoing pandemic, and to improve understanding of how to work with care home staff and organisations after the pandemic has passed.

methodsTen managers of registered care homes in the East Midlands of England were interviewed by videoconference or phone about their experiences of the crisis from a structured organisational perspective. Analysis used an adapted organisational framework analysis approach with a focus on social ties and interdependencies between organisations and individuals.

resultsThree key groups of interdependencies were identified: care processes and practice; resources; and governance. Care home staff had to deliver care in innovative ways, making high stakes decisions in circumstances defined by: fluid ties to organisations outside the care home; multiple, sometimes conflicting, sources of expertise and information; and a sense of deprioritisation by authorities. Organisational responses to the pandemic by central government resulted in resource constraints and additional work, and sometimes impaired the ability of staff and managers to make decisions. Local communities, including businesses, third-sector organisations and individuals, were key in helping care homes overcome challenges. Care homes, rather than competing, were found to work together to provide mutual support. Resilience in the system was a consequence of dedicated and resourceful staff using existing local networks, or forging new ones, to overcome barriers to care.

conclusionsThis study identified how interdependency between care home organisations, the surrounding community, and key statutory and non-statutory organisations beyond their locality, shaped decision making and care delivery during the pandemic. Recognising these interdependencies, and the expertise shown by care home managers and staff as they navigate them, is key to providing effective healthcare in care homes as the pandemic progresses, and as the sector recovers afterwards.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsEnglandHumansQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Homes for the agedInterdependenciesKnowledge sharingOrganisational healthcare

Identifiers

PMID33546612
PMCPMC7863040
OpenAlexW3105115072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.