Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546605›Full record

SynthesisBMC geriatrics2021

Intergenerational caring: a systematic literature review on young and young adult caregivers of older people.

Barbara D'Amen, Marco Socci, Sara Santini

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Interventions to support young carers/supporters of people living with dementia: a mixed methods systematic review.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Telesupervision in Psychotherapy: A Bibliometric and Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Mental health of young informal carers: a systematic review.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Analysis of Caregiver Burden Expressed in Social Media Discussions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara D'AmenCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, IRCCS INRCA - National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124, Ancona, Italy.
Marco SocciCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, IRCCS INRCA - National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124, Ancona, Italy. m.socci@inrca.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-2167
Sara SantiniCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Aging, IRCCS INRCA - National Institute of Health and Science on Aging, Via Santa Margherita 5, 60124, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe theme of young family caregivers of older relatives is still partially uncovered, although the phenomenon is increasing worldwide. This Systematic Literature Review discusses methodological and content issues of ten articles covering this topic, in order to contribute to increase the knowledge and provide suggestions for designing effective support services for adolescent young caregivers. To this purpose, the findings of this review are framed within the caregiving stress appraisal model (renamed CSA model) elaborated by Yates' and collegues, in order to highlight differences between young caregivers and the older ones.

methodsMultiple databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, ProQuest - Psychology Database, CINAHL Complete - EBSCOHost were used to carry out a systematic review of the literature. Additional references were retrieved from experts contacted and research knowledge. The selected articles underwent both methodological appraisal and contents analysis: for every article an appraisal score was calculated and themes and sub-themes were identified.

resultsOut of the ten included studies three were mixed methods, six qualitative and one quantitative. Nine reached a high quality methodological score and one medium. Four main themes emerged from the content analysis: aspects of the caregiving relationship; effects of caregiving; coping strategies; recommendations for services, policy and research.

conclusionsSelected studies explored practical features of the relationship between young caregivers and older family members (tasks performed, motivations, coping strategies) and highlighted both positive and negative outcomes on young people's everyday life condition and future development. Nevertheless, these evidences were often limited to small samples that did not allow to make generalizations. More studies are needed including large samples in order to deepen the different aspects of caregiving and design tailored support services.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT)Older peopleSystematic literature reviewYoung adult caregiversYoung caregivers

Identifiers

PMID33546605
PMCPMC7863294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.