Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546588›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2021

Completeness of the operating room to intensive care unit handover: a matter of time?

Fabian Dusse, Johanna Pütz, Andreas Böhmer, Mark Schieren, Robin Joppich, Frank Wappler

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Delivery of the TeamSTEPPSBMC medical education · 2025
    Article
  4. Perioperative handovers-lost in transition.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabian DusseDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Johanna PützDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Andreas BöhmerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Mark SchierenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. schierenm@kliniken-koeln.de.
Robin JoppichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Frank WapplerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Witten/Herdecke, Medical Center Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHandovers of post-anesthesia patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) are often unstructured and performed under time pressure. Hence, they bear a high risk of poor communication, loss of information and potential patient harm. The aim of this study was to investigate the completeness of information transfer and the quantity of information loss during post anesthesia handovers of critical care patients.

methodsUsing a self-developed checklist, including 55 peri-operative items, patient handovers from the operation room or post anesthesia care unit to the ICU staff were observed and documented in real time. Observations were analyzed for the amount of correct and completely transferred patient data in relation to the written documentation within the anesthesia record and the patient's chart.

resultsDuring a ten-week study period, 97 handovers were included. The mean duration of a handover was 146 seconds, interruptions occurred in 34% of all cases. While some items were transferred frequently (basic patient characteristics [72%], surgical procedure [83%], intraoperative complications [93.8%]) others were commonly missed (underlying diseases [23%], long-term medication [6%]). The completeness of information transfer is associated with the handover's duration [B coefficient (95% CI): 0.118 (0.084-0.152), p<0.001] and increases significantly in handovers exceeding a duration of 2 minutes (24% ± 11.7 vs. 40% ± 18.04, p<0.001).

conclusionsHandover completeness is affected by time pressure, interruptions, and inappropriate surroundings, which increase the risk of information loss. To improve completeness and ensure patient safety, an adequate time span for handover, and the implementation of communication tools are required.

Indexed as

CommunicationIntensive Care UnitsOperating RoomsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChecklistCritical CareFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient HandoffPatient SafetyProspective StudiesCommunicationHand‐offHandover durationICUInformation lossPatient handoverPatient safety

Identifiers

PMID33546588
PMCPMC7863365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.