Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546275›Full record

ArticlePolymers2021

A 3D Bioprinted Material That Recapitulates the Perivascular Bone Marrow Structure for Sustained Hematopoietic and Cancer Models.

Caitlyn A Moore, Zain Siddiqui, Griffin J Carney, Yahaira Naaldijk, Khadidiatou Guiro, Alejandra I Ferrer, Lauren S Sherman, Murat Guvendiren, Vivek A Kumar, Pranela Rameshwar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlyn A MooreDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Zain SiddiquiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Griffin J CarneyDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Yahaira NaaldijkDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-3963
Khadidiatou GuiroDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Alejandra I FerrerDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Lauren S ShermanDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
Murat GuvendirenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3475-1051
Vivek A KumarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 323 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7536-9281
Pranela RameshwarDepartment of Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0434-9034
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

New Jersey Cancer Commission 824316 / 124003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Translational medicine requires facile experimental systems to replicate the dynamic biological systems of diseases. Drug approval continues to lag, partly due to incongruencies in the research pipeline that traditionally involve 2D models, which could be improved with 3D models. The bone marrow (BM) poses challenges to harvest as an intact organ, making it difficult to study disease processes such as breast cancer (BC) survival in BM, and to effective evaluation of drug response in BM. Furthermore, it is a challenge to develop 3D BM structures due to its weak physical properties, and complex hierarchical structure and cellular landscape. To address this, we leveraged 3D bioprinting to create a BM structure with varied methylcellulose (M): alginate (A) ratios. We selected hydrogels containing 4% (

Indexed as

alginatebioprintingbone marrowbreast cancerhydrogelmethylcellulosestem cells

Identifiers

PMID33546275
PMCPMC7913313
OpenAlexW3126586840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.