ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
COVID-19 and the Political Economy of Mass Hysteria.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.
- Managing an infodemic in the global south: a systematic evidence synthesis from COVID-19 social listening reports.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Mass hysteria attack rates in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Pooled it
- Risks and benefits of face masks in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- What Lessons can Be Learned From the Management of the COVID-19 Pandemic?International journal of public health · 2025Review
- Tracing In-Hospital COVID-19 Outcomes: A Multistate Model Exploration (TRACE).Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Support from Social Media during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Epidemic outcomes following government responses to COVID-19: Insights from nearly 100,000 models.Science advances · 2024Article
- Review
- The manifestation and causes of public panic in the early stage of COVID-19 in China: a framework based on consciousness-attitude-behavior.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Is society caught up in a Death Spiral? Modeling societal demise and its reversal.Frontiers in sociology · 2024Review
- Rejoinder 2: Educating kids during a pandemic: More "farmers," fewer experts.Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent · 2023Article
- Article
- COVID-19 pandemic and hypertension: an updated report from the Japanese Society of Hypertension project team on COVID-19.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023Review
- The pox of politics: Troesken's tradeoff reexamined.Public choice · 2023Article
- Long COVID as a functional somatic symptom disorder caused by abnormally precise prior expectations during Bayesian perceptual processing: A new hypothesis and implications for pandemic response.SAGE open medicine · 2023Review
- Protecting public's wellbeing against COVID-19 infodemic: The role of trust in information sources and rapid dissemination and transparency of information over time.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Subjective burden of government-imposed Covid-19 restrictions in Switzerland: Evidence from the 2022 LINK Covid-19 survey.PloS one · 2023Article
- The emergence of COVID-19 over-concern immediately after the cancelation of the measures adopted by the dynamic zero-COVID policy in China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A breach in the social contract: Limited participation and limited evidence in COVID-19 responses.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2022Article
- Are Lockdowns Effective in Managing Pandemics?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we aim to develop a political economy of mass hysteria. Using the background of COVID-19, we study past mass hysteria. Negative information which is spread through mass media repetitively can affect public health negatively in the form of nocebo effects and mass hysteria. We argue that mass and digital media in connection with the state may have had adverse consequences during the COVID-19 crisis. The resulting collective hysteria may have contributed to policy errors by governments not in line with health recommendations. While mass hysteria can occur in societies with a minimal state, we show that there exist certain self-corrective mechanisms and limits to the harm inflicted, such as sacrosanct private property rights. However, mass hysteria can be exacerbated and self-reinforcing when the negative information comes from an authoritative source, when the media are politicized, and social networks make the negative information omnipresent. We conclude that the negative long-term effects of mass hysteria are exacerbated by the size of the state.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.