Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546114›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Population Pharmacokinetic Method to Predict Within-Subject Variability Using Single-Period Clinical Data.

Won-Ho Kang, Jae-Yeon Lee, Jung-Woo Chae, Kyeong-Ryoon Lee, In-Hwan Baek, Min-Soo Kim, Hyun-Moon Back, Sangkeun Jung, Craig Shaffer, Rada Savic and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Won-Ho KangCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Deajeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0184-1613
Jae-Yeon LeeCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Deajeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4420-0533
Jung-Woo ChaeCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Deajeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-7063
Kyeong-Ryoon LeeLaboratory Animal Resource Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Ochang 28116, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2175-8876
In-Hwan BaekCollege of Pharmacy, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9538-0565
Min-Soo KimCollege of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea.
Hyun-Moon BackDepartment, Pharmaceutics, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08854, USA.
Sangkeun JungDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.
Craig ShafferDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Rada SavicDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Hwi-Yeol YunCollege of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Deajeon 34134, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8793-2449

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea 2020-0-01441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sample sizes for single-period clinical trials, including pharmacokinetic studies, are statistically determined by within-subject variability (WSV). However, it is difficult to determine WSV without replicate-designed clinical trial data, and statisticians typically estimate optimal sample sizes using total variability, not WSV. We have developed an efficient population-based method to predict WSV accurately with single-period clinical trial data and demonstrate method performance with eperisone. We simulated 1000 virtual pharmacokinetic clinical trial datasets based on single-period and dense sampling studies, with various study sizes and levels of WSV and interindividual variabilities (IIVs). The estimated residual variability (RV) resulting from population pharmacokinetic methods were compared with WSV values. In addition, 3 × 3 bioequivalence results of eperisone were used to evaluate method performance with a real clinical dataset. With WSV of 40% or less, regardless of IIV magnitude, RV was well approximated by WSV for sample sizes greater than 18 subjects. RV was underestimated at WSV of 50% or greater, even with datasets having low IIV and numerous subjects. Using the eperisone dataset, RV was 44% to 48%, close to the true value of 50%. In conclusion, the estimated RV accurately predicted WSV in single-period studies, validating this method for sample size estimation in clinical trials.

Indexed as

interindividual variabilitypharmacokineticsresidual variabilitystatistical modeling

Identifiers

PMID33546114
PMCPMC7913178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.