Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546064›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Prognostic impact of eosinophils in peripheral blood and tumor site in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Xiyue Yang, Lei Wang, Huan Du, Binwei Lin, Jie Yi, Xuemei Wen, Lidan Geng, Xiaobo Du

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Eosinophils in solid cancers: sentinels, predictors, and therapeutic allies.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Harnessing myeloid cells in cancer.Molecular cancer · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xiyue YangDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.
Lei WangPathology department, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Huan DuDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.
Binwei LinDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.
Jie YiPathology department, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xuemei WenDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.
Lidan GengDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.
Xiaobo DuDepartment of Oncology, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan.ORCID 0000-0001-6348-0636
Mianyang Central Hospital · CN

Funding

Mianyang Science and Technology Bureau 15-S01-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractTo date, no effective biological markers have been identified for predicting the prognosis of esophageal cancer patients. Recent studies have shown that eosinophils are independent prognostic factors in some cancers. This study aimed to identify the prognostic impact of eosinophils in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).This study enrolled 136 patients who received CCRT for locally advanced unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We evaluated the survival time and clinical pathological characteristics of eosinophils. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival data. The log-rank test was used for univariate analysis and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to conduct a multivariate analysis.Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high eosinophil infiltration correlated with better overall survival (OS) (P = .008) and better progression-free survival (PFS) (P = .015). The increase in absolute eosinophil count after CCRT also enhanced OS (P = .005) and PFS (P = .007). The PFS and OS in patients with high blood eosinophil count before CCRT (>2%) was better than those with low blood eosinophil count(<2%) (P = .006 and P = .001, respectively). Additionally, the multivariate analysis revealed that disease stage and high eosinophil infiltration, increased peripheral blood absolute eosinophil count after CCRT, and high peripheral blood eosinophil count before CCRT were independent prognostic indicators.High eosinophil count of tumor site, increased peripheral blood absolute eosinophil count after CCRT, and high peripheral blood eosinophil count before CCRT are favorable prognostic factors for patients with ESCC treated with CCRT.

Indexed as

PrognosisAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyEosinophilsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33546064
PMCPMC7837956
OpenAlexW3125317907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.