Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546039›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Efficacy of minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage: A protocol of randomized controlled trial.

Jiang Liu, Jing Cheng, Hongjun Zhou, Chunyan Deng, Zhengxin Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Jiang LiuCenter for Neurological Diseases, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401120, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6889-9911
Jing Cheng
Hongjun Zhou
Chunyan Deng
Zhengxin Wang
Hatch (Canada) · CA

Funding

Chongqing Science and technology plan project No.20160328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH) is the most serious complication of hypertension. Clearing intracranial hematoma as soon as possible, reducing brain cell edema, and controlling intracranial pressure could effectively reduce neuron damage, lower patient mortality, and improve patient prognosis. At present, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been widely used and plays an important role in the treatment of HICH. However, it is still in controversies about the choice of surgical treatment and medication treatment for HICH. Therefore, we try to conduct a randomized, controlled, prospective trial to observe the efficacy of MIS treatment against HICH compared with medication treatment.

methodsPatients will be randomly divided into treatment group and control group in a 1:1 ratio using the random number generator in Microsoft Excel. Stereotactic soft channel minimally invasive intracranial hematoma puncture and drainage treatment and medication treatment will be applied respectively. The outcomes of intracerebral hemorrhage volume, Glasgow coma scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale will be recorded.

conclusionsThe findings of the study will be helpful for the choice of MIS and conservative treatment when treating HICH patients.

trial registrationOSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/ME6Y5.

Indexed as

CraniotomyHumansIntracranial Hemorrhage, HypertensiveMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33546039
PMCPMC7837866
OpenAlexW3125072944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.