Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33546007›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2021

Fecal calprotectin as a noninvasive test to predict deep remission in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Ludimilla Dos Reis Malvão, Kalil Madi, Barbara Cathalá Esberard, Renata Fernandes de Amorim, Kelly Dos Santos Silva, Katia Farias E Silva, Heitor Siffert Pereira de Souza, Ana Teresa Pugas Carvalho

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. LIAISONUnited European gastroenterology journal · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ludimilla Dos Reis MalvãoDepartment of Gastroenterology, State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Kalil MadiDepartment Pathology.
Barbara Cathalá EsberardDepartment of Gastroenterology, State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Renata Fernandes de AmorimDepartment of Gastroenterology, State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Kelly Dos Santos SilvaDepartment of Gastroenterology, State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Katia Farias E SilvaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
Heitor Siffert Pereira de SouzaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.ORCID 0000-0002-3647-7324
Ana Teresa Pugas CarvalhoDepartment of Gastroenterology, State University of Rio de Janeiro.
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · US

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306634/2019-8Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E26/202.781/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractMucosal healing (MH) has become a major target in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). Because repeat endoscopy is expensive and invasive, we aimed to evaluate fecal calprotectin (FC) as an alternative marker to predict MH in UC.Eighty patients with UC in clinical remission were consecutively included in a prospective observational study. FC was measured using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The colonic mucosa was assessed for endoscopic and histological measures of inflammatory status. Endoscopic and histological remission were defined according to the Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) and Geboes score (GS), respectively. Deep remission was defined as a combination of the MES and GS. FC performance and cutoff values for identifying MH and deep remission were determined using contingency tables and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analysis.The median FC concentration in patients who met the criteria for deep remission (MES ≤1 and GS < 3.1) was 65.5 μg/g, while that in patients with disease activity was 389.6 μg/g (P = .025). A FC cutoff value of 100 μg/g, determined by the ROC analysis, resulted in sensitivity and specificity of 91.7% and 57.1%, respectively, for histological remission, and 82.4% and 60.9%, respectively, for deep mucosal remission. Positive correlations were detected between FC concentrations with the histologic (CC: 0.435; P < .001) and the combined endoscopic and histologic (CC: 0.413; P < .001) scores.FC can be used confidently as a noninvasive biomarker to predict deep remission in patients with UC in clinical remission when concentrations are below 100 μg/g.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersColitis, UlcerativeCross-Sectional StudiesFecesFemaleHumansIntestinal MucosaLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionBiomarkersLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID33546007
PMCPMC7837839
OpenAlexW3121144295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.