ArticleMedicine2021
A clinician survey for management of the secondary immunodeficiency caused by hematological malignancies in China.
Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Secondary antibody deficiencies in the modern era: emerging trends, diagnostic pitfalls, and advances in personalised management.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Access and use of immunoglobulins in secondary supportive cancer care: A systematic literature review.The journal of medicine accessReview
- Access and use of immunoglobulins in supportive cancer care: A thematic analysis of a systematic review data set.The journal of medicine accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
abstractUnlike Western countries, there are still few clinical immunology specialists in China, and the optimal care for secondary immunodeficiency caused by hematological malignancies is unknown. Therefore, we initiated this clinician survey study to describe the current situation of the care for malignancy patients with hypogammaglobulinemia in China.We adapted a previously published online questionnaire of current clinical practices regarding the management of secondary immunodeficiency caused by hematological malignancies and then distributed the questionnaire to 52 hematologists in China via WeChat mobile software; the survey collected demographic details, starting dosage, target immunoglobulin (Ig) level, monitoring, criteria for stopping Ig replacement, vaccination use, and oral antibiotic prophylaxis for hypogammaglobulinemia patients.Forty-eight hematologists responded. 28(58.33%) respondents had more than 10 years of experience. Nevertheless, 40(83.33%) respondents reported that they did not use any specific criteria for prophylactic Ig replacement in hypogammaglobulinemia patients. However, 27(56.25%) respondents reported that they had used intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); however, the starting dose, frequency, and target Ig level were significantly varied. Additionally, the criteria for stopping Ig replacement were significantly varied. Only one respondent (2.08%) used subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG). Moreover, 35(72.92%) respondents reported no vaccination prior to Ig replacement, and 47(97.92%) respondents reported that they had not used antibiotic prophylaxis in secondary hypogammaglobulinemia patients.Official guideline for the care for secondary immunodeficiency (SID) of the hematological malignancies patients should be issued in China, and significant attention of the hematologists should be paid to the use of prophylactic antibiotics and Ig replacement for the care of patients with hypogammaglobulinemia caused by hematological malignancies, as these agents could significantly reduce the infection rate in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.