Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33545652›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021

Ambulatory care for epilepsy via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Proleta Datta, Wattana Barrett, Monica Bentzinger, Tracy Jasinski, Lakshman Arcot Jayagopal, Alexa Mahoney, Crystal Pearon, Arun Swaminathan, Aditya Vuppala, Kaeli K Samson and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic: Correlating Responsive Neurostimulation System data with patient reports.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Tell on Telehealth.Epilepsy currents
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Proleta DattaDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States. Electronic address: proleta.datta@unmc.edu.
Wattana BarrettDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Monica BentzingerNebraska Medicine Hospital, Omaha, NE, United States.
Tracy JasinskiDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Lakshman Arcot JayagopalDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Alexa MahoneyNebraska Medicine Hospital, Omaha, NE, United States.
Crystal PearonNebraska Medicine Hospital, Omaha, NE, United States.
Arun SwaminathanDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Aditya VuppalaDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Kaeli K SamsonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Hongmei WangDepartment of Health Service Research and Administration, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Olga TaraschenkoDepartment of Neurological Science, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USNebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess feasibility, patient satisfaction, and financial advantages of telemedicine for epilepsy ambulatory care during the current COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsThe demographic and clinical characteristics of all consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine at a level 4 epilepsy center between March 20 and April 20, 2020 were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records. A telephone survey to assess patient satisfaction and preferences was conducted within one month following the initial visit.

resultsAmong 223 telehealth patients, 85.7% used both synchronous audio and video technology. During the visits, 39% of patients had their anticonvulsants adjusted while 18.8% and 11.2% were referred to laboratory/diagnostic testing and specialty consults, respectively. In a post-visit survey, the highest degree of satisfaction with care was expressed by 76.9% of patients. The degree of satisfaction tended to increase the further a patient lived from the clinic (p = 0.05). Beyond the pandemic, 89% of patients reported a preference for continuing telemedicine if their epilepsy symptoms remained stable, while only 44.4% chose telemedicine should their symptoms worsen. Inclement weather and lack of transportation were factors favoring continued use of telemedicine. An estimated cost saving to patient attributed to telemedicine was $30.20 ± 3.8 per visit. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that epilepsy care via telemedicine provided high satisfaction and economic benefit, without compromising patients' quality of care, thereby supporting the use of virtual care during current and future epidemiological fallouts. Beyond the current pandemic, patients with stable seizure symptoms may prefer to use telemedicine for their epilepsy care.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Care FacilitiesAdultAmbulatory CareCOVID-19Electronic Health RecordsEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient SatisfactionReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicineAmbulatory careCOVID-19Healthcare accessPandemicTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33545652
PMCPMC8803629
OpenAlexW3129119916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.