ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021
Ambulatory care for epilepsy via telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Telemedicine in epilepsy care: A Nationwide survey by the Italian Chapter of the International League Against Epilepsy (LICE) on adoption, barriers, and perceived value.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Caregiver perceptions of telemedicine in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies: a nationwide Spanish survey.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Tele-neurology in Latin America: digital solutions for a treatment gap.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Unlocking the Potential of Telemedicine in Epilepsy: Noninferiority Analysis of Efficacy and Identifying Patient Preferences.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Telepharmacy services to support patients with epilepsy in Thailand: A descriptive study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Long-term analysis of the effects of COVID-19 in people with epilepsy: Results from a multicenter on-line survey across the pandemic waves.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2022Article
- Seizure control during the COVID-19 pandemic: Correlating Responsive Neurostimulation System data with patient reports.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 pandemic influence on epilepsy course in pediatric patients.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2022Article
- Early impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on in-person outpatient care utilisation: a rapid review.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Evaluation and Treatment of Seizures and Epilepsy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Demographic and technological factors influencing virtual seizure clinic visit satisfaction before and during the Covid-19 pandemic in rural Hawaii.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2021Article
- The Tell on Telehealth.Epilepsy currentsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess feasibility, patient satisfaction, and financial advantages of telemedicine for epilepsy ambulatory care during the current COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThe demographic and clinical characteristics of all consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine at a level 4 epilepsy center between March 20 and April 20, 2020 were obtained retrospectively from electronic medical records. A telephone survey to assess patient satisfaction and preferences was conducted within one month following the initial visit.
resultsAmong 223 telehealth patients, 85.7% used both synchronous audio and video technology. During the visits, 39% of patients had their anticonvulsants adjusted while 18.8% and 11.2% were referred to laboratory/diagnostic testing and specialty consults, respectively. In a post-visit survey, the highest degree of satisfaction with care was expressed by 76.9% of patients. The degree of satisfaction tended to increase the further a patient lived from the clinic (p = 0.05). Beyond the pandemic, 89% of patients reported a preference for continuing telemedicine if their epilepsy symptoms remained stable, while only 44.4% chose telemedicine should their symptoms worsen. Inclement weather and lack of transportation were factors favoring continued use of telemedicine. An estimated cost saving to patient attributed to telemedicine was $30.20 ± 3.8 per visit. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings suggest that epilepsy care via telemedicine provided high satisfaction and economic benefit, without compromising patients' quality of care, thereby supporting the use of virtual care during current and future epidemiological fallouts. Beyond the current pandemic, patients with stable seizure symptoms may prefer to use telemedicine for their epilepsy care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.