Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33545517›Full record

ReviewClinical imaging2021

SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis using medical imaging techniques and artificial intelligence: A review.

Narjes Benameur, Ramzi Mahmoudi, Soraya Zaid, Younes Arous, Badii Hmida, Mohamed Hedi Bedoui

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal analyses usingAntiviral research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Narjes BenameurUniversity of Tunis El Manar, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technology, Tunis, Tunisia. Electronic address: narjes.benameur@yahoo.fr.
Ramzi MahmoudiUniversité de Monastir - Laboratoire Technologie Imagerie Médicale - LTIM-LR12ES06, Faculté de Médecine de Monastir, 5019, Monastir, Tunisia; Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire d'Informatique Gaspard-Monge, Unité Mixte CNRS-UMLV-ESIEE UMR8049, ESIEE Paris Cité Descartes, BP99, 93162 Noisy Le Grand, France.
Soraya ZaidService Imagerie, Centre Hospitalier Escartons Briancon, France.
Younes ArousRadiology Service, Military Hospital of Instruction of Tunis, Tunisia.
Badii HmidaRadiology Service, UR12SP40, CHU Fattouma Bourguiba, 5019 Monastir, Tunisia.
Mohamed Hedi BedouiUniversité de Monastir - Laboratoire Technologie Imagerie Médicale - LTIM-LR12ES06, Faculté de Médecine de Monastir, 5019, Monastir, Tunisia.
Hospital Fatuma Bourguiba Monastir · TNMilitary Hospital of Tunis · TNTunis El Manar University · TNUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Monastir · TN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSARS-CoV-2 is a worldwide health emergency with unrecognized clinical features. This paper aims to review the most recent medical imaging techniques used for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and their potential contributions to attenuate the pandemic. Recent researches, including artificial intelligence tools, will be described.

methodsWe review the main clinical features of SARS-CoV-2 revealed by different medical imaging techniques. First, we present the clinical findings of each technique. Then, we describe several artificial intelligence approaches introduced for the SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis.

resultsCT is the most accurate diagnostic modality of SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, ground-glass opacities and consolidation are the most common signs of SARS-CoV-2 in CT images. However, other findings such as reticular pattern, and crazy paving could be observed. We also found that pleural effusion and pneumothorax features are less common in SARS-CoV-2. According to the literature, the B lines artifacts and pleural line irregularities are the common signs of SARS-CoV-2 in ultrasound images. We have also stated the different studies, focusing on artificial intelligence tools, to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 severity. We found that most of the reported works based on deep learning focused on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 from medical images while the challenge for the radiologists is how to differentiate between SARS-CoV-2 and other viral infections with the same clinical features.

conclusionThe identification of SARS-CoV-2 manifestations on medical images is a key step in radiological workflow for the diagnosis of the virus and could be useful for researchers working on computer-aided diagnosis of pulmonary infections.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Artificial IntelligenceCOVID-19 TestingHumansLungTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligenceChest CTClinical findingsMedical imaging techniquesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33545517
PMCPMC7840409
OpenAlexW3123536399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.