Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33545499›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory medicine2021

Characteristics and outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the first 28 days of the spring and autumn pandemic waves in Milan: An observational prospective study.

Dejan Radovanovic, Stefano Pini, Elisa Franceschi, Marica Pecis, Andrea Airoldi, Maurizio Rizzi, Pierachille Santus

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recent Advance Analysis of Recovery in Hospitalized People with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. COVID-19 pneumonia: pathophysiology and management.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dejan RadovanovicDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: dejan.radovanovic@asst-fbf-sacco.it.
Stefano PiniDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi di Milano, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: stefano.pini@unimi.it.
Elisa FranceschiDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi di Milano, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: elisa.franceschi@unimi.it.
Marica PecisDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: marica.pecis@asst-fbf-sacco.it.
Andrea AiroldiDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.airoldi@asst-fbf-sacco.it.
Maurizio RizziDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: maurizio.rizzi@asst-fbf-sacco.it.
Pierachille SantusDivision of Respiratory Diseases, Ospedale L. Sacco, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences (DIBIC), Università Degli Studi di Milano, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, ASST Fatebenefratelli-Sacco, Via G.B. Grassi 74, 20157, Milano, Italy. Electronic address: pierachille.santus@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe therapeutic approach to COVID-19 and healthcare system preparedness improved during 2020. We compared characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the first 28 days of the March and October pandemic waves in Milan, Italy. MATERIAL AND

methodsA prospective, observational study enrolling adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia during March 7-April 4 (1st period) and October 15-November 12 (2nd period). During the 1st period hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir and therapeutic enoxaparin when thrombosis was confirmed were administered; systemic corticosteroids were given in case of severe pneumonia. During the 2nd period dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, remdesivir, thromboprophylaxis or anticoagulation were administered according to international recommendations. Patients with respiratory distress on oxygen masks initiated CPAP. Outcomes were: length of hospital stay, all-cause in-hospital mortality and need for intubation.

resultsWe included 70 patients (75% males) during the 1st and 76 patients (51% males, p = 0.522) during the 2nd period. Prevalence of severe respiratory failure (30% vs. 12%, p = 0.006), and D-dimer >3000 FEU (34% vs. 15%, P = 0.012) were reduced during the 2nd period, while anticoagulation and corticosteroids were more frequently administered (both p < 0.01). Mortality and time to referral were also reduced (39.4% vs. 22.4%, p = 0.019 and 6 vs. 5 days, p = 0.014), while need for intubation didn't change. Hospitalization length was comparable, but the proportion of patients discharged home was higher during the 2nd period (28.2% vs. 55.4%, p = 0.001).

conclusionsChanging treatment paradigms and early referral might have reduced mortality in COVID-19 patients. The effects of specific therapeutic regimens needs further confirmation in future clinical studies.

Indexed as

HospitalizationRespiratory TherapyAdultAgedAnticoagulantsAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19FemaleHospital MortalityHumansItalyLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSeasonsAnticoagulantsAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19CPAPMortalityPneumoniaRespiratory failureTreatment

Identifiers

PMID33545499
PMCPMC7847282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.