ArticleExperimental eye research2021
Isolated human crystalline lens three-dimensional shape: A comparison between Indian and European populations.
Article in Experimental eye research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of three-dimensional lens parameters in patients with age-related cataracts.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Mysteries of the Chinese lens zonule balance tension: A statistical analysis.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Estimation of the full shape of the crystalline lensBiomedical optics express · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
There have been many studies on lens properties in specific populations (e.g. in China, Europe, Singapore, etc.) some of which suggest there may be differences between populations. Differences could be caused by ethnic or environmental influences or experimental procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if any differences exist between Indian and European populations in the central geometric and full shape properties of human lenses. Two custom-developed spectral domain optical coherence tomography systems were used to acquire the crystalline lens geometry: one in India (69 lenses from 59 donors) and the other in Spain (24 lenses from 19 donors). The steps for obtaining accurate 3-D models from optical coherence tomography raw images comprised of image segmentation, fan and optical distortion correction, tilt removal and registration. The outcome variables were lens equatorial diameter, lens thickness, anterior and posterior lens thicknesses and their ratio, central radius of curvature of the anterior and posterior lens surfaces, lens volume and lens surface area. A mixed effects model by maximum likelihood estimation was used to evaluate the effect of age, population and their interaction (age*population) on lens parameters. After adjusting for age, there were no population differences observed in anterior and posterior radii of curvature, equatorial diameter, lens thickness, anterior and posterior lens thicknesses and their ratio, volume and surface area (all p ≥ 0.08). There was also no effect of the interaction term on anterior and posterior radii of curvature, equatorial diameter, lens thickness, anterior and posterior lens thicknesses and their ratio, volume and surface area (all p ≥ 0.06). All central geometric and full shape parameters appeared to be comparable between the European and Indian populations. This is the first study to compare geometric and full shape lens parameters between different populations in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.