ReviewCancer science2021
The multigene classifiers 95GC/42GC/155GC for precision medicine in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.
Review in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of gene expression profiling and mutation analysis via RNA sequencing: transitioning the 95-gene classifier to a next-generation platform in early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026Article
- Validation of the predictive ability for recurrence and the clinical utility of the 95-gene classifier (95GC) through an integrated analysis of five studies.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Validation of late recurrence prediction by gene expression profiles and clinicopathological factors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Article
- Select gene mutations associated with survival outcomes in ER-positive ERBB2-negative early-stage invasive breast cancer: A single-institutional tissue bank study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Validation of the prognosis of patients with ER‑positive, HER2‑negative and node‑negative invasive breast cancer classified as low risk by CurebestOncology letters · 2023Article
- Leveraging transcriptomics for precision diagnosis: Lessons learned from cancer and sepsis.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Oncofertility and Reproductive Counseling in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The multigene classifiers 95GC/42GC/155GC for precision medicine in ER-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer.Cancer science · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical decision-making, to decide the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2-), and node-negative (n0) breast cancer patients, the accurate estimation of recurrence risk is essential. Unfortunately, conventional prognostic factors, such as tumor size, histological grade and ER, progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status as well as Ki67 index, are not sufficiently accurate for such estimation. Therefore, several multigene assays (MGAs) based on the mRNA expression analysis of multiple genes in tumor tissue have been developed to better predict patient prognosis. These assays include Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, PAM50, GGI, EndoPredict, and BCI. We developed Curebest™ 95-Gene Classifier Breast (95GC) classifier, which is unique in that mRNA expression data of all 20 000 human genes are secondarily obtainable, as the 95GC assay is performed using Affymetrix microarray. This can capture mRNA expression of not only 95 genes but also every gene at once, and such gene expression data can be utilized by the other MGAs that we have developed, such as the 155GC, which is used for the prognostic prediction of ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We also developed the 42GC for predicting late recurrence in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. In this mini-review, our recent attempt at the development of various MGAs, which is expected to facilitate the implementation of precision medicine in ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients, is presented with a special emphasis on 95GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.