Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544803›Full record

ArticleRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie

Agreement of two pre-trained deep-learning neural networks built with transfer learning with six pathologists on 6000 patches of prostate cancer from Gleason2019 Challenge.

Mircea Sebastian Şerbănescu, Carmen Nicoleta Oancea, Costin Teodor Streba, Iancu Emil Pleşea, Daniel Pirici, Liliana Streba, Răzvan Mihail Pleşea

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reliable deep learning for coronary artery disease detection: a patient-level, statistically validated MRI study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Deep learning with transfer learning in pathology. Case study: classification of basal cell carcinoma.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Analysis of the relationship between placental histopathological aspects of preterm and term birth.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
  12. Automated cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma grading using deep learning with transfer learning.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mircea Sebastian ŞerbănescuDepartment of Scientific Research Methodology and Department of Pulmonology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania; costin.streba@umfcv.ro.
Carmen Nicoleta Oancea
Costin Teodor Streba
Iancu Emil Pleşea
Daniel Pirici
Liliana Streba
Răzvan Mihail Pleşea

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile the visual inspection of histopathology images by expert pathologists remains the golden standard method for grading of prostate cancer the quest for developing automated algorithms for the job is set and deep-learning techniques have emerged on top of other approaches.

methodsTwo pre-trained deep-learning networks, obtained with transfer learning from two general purpose classification networks - AlexNet and GoogleNet, originally trained on a proprietary dataset of prostate cancer were used to classify 6000 cropped images from Gleason2019 Challenge.

resultsThe average agreement between the two networks and the six pathologists was found to be substantial for AlexNet and moderate for GoogleNet. When tested against the majority vote of the six pathologists the agreement was perfect and moderate for AlexNet, and GoogleNet, respectively. Despite our expectations, the average inter-pathologist agreement was moderate, while between the two networks it was substantial. Resulted accuracy for AlexNet and GoogleNet when tested against the majority vote as ground truth was of 85.51% and 74.75%, respectively. This result was higher than the score obtained on the dataset that they were trained on, showing their generalization capabilities.

conclusionsBoth the agreement and the accuracy indicate a better performance of AlexNet over GoogleNet, making it suitable for clinical deployment thus could potentially contribute to faster, more accurate and with higher reproducibility prostate cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPathologistsProstatic NeoplasmsHistory, 21st CenturyHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID33544803
PMCPMC7864291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.