ArticlePloS one2021
Socio-ecological predictors of mental health outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impacts for health and care workers of Covid-19 and other public health emergencies of international concern: living systematic review, meta-analysis and policy recommendations.Human resources for health · 2024Pooled it
- Anxiety Linked to COVID-19: A Systematic Review Comparing Anxiety Rates in Different Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Comparison of the Mental Health Impact of COVID-19 on Vulnerable and Non-Vulnerable Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Stigmatization from Work-Related COVID-19 Exposure: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Prevalence of common mental health issues among migrant workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2021Pooled it
- Health care worker experiences with a brief peer support and well-being intervention during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Testing an Intervention to Improve Health Care Worker Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Surviving SARS and living through COVID-19: Healthcare worker mental health outcomes and insights for coping.PloS one · 2021Trial
- "The Only People That Really Understand": A Qualitative Study of Healthcare Workers' COVID-19 Experiences and Implications for Workplace Support.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Moral injury and influencing factors among palliative care nurses : a cross-sectional study.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Leveraging COVID-19 Experiences to Prepare for the Future: A Pilot Study with Hospital Social Workers.Health & social work · 2026Article
- The impact and implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health experiences of medical students in Hong Kong.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- An integrated rehabilitation workforce within secondary healthcare in Pakistan: a qualitative study with physiotherapists.Health policy and planning · 2025Article
- Balancing mental health through predictive modeling for healthcare workers during public health crises.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A socio-ecological model of the management of leprosy reactions in Indonesia and India using the experiences of affected individuals, family members and healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Vicarious Racism, Direct Racism, and Mental Health Among Racialized Minority Healthcare Workers.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Article
- Co-rumination and intrapersonal cognitive processes predict distress: Longitudinal evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress · 2024Article
- Nurses' use of 'wellness' supplements during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.Journal of advanced nursing · 2024Article
- What Mattered Most: Personal, Work-Related, and Psychopathological Characteristics Associated with Healthcare Workers' Impairment of Functioning during COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Mapping the needs of healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients using the socio-ecological framework: a rapid scoping review.Human resources for health · 2024Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers are at increased risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies are warranted that examine socio-ecological factors associated with these outcomes to inform interventions that support healthcare workers during future disease outbreaks.
methodsWe conducted an online cross-sectional study of healthcare workers during May 2020 to assess the socio-ecological predictors of mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. We assessed factors at four socio-ecological levels: individual (e.g., gender), interpersonal (e.g., social support), institutional (e.g., personal protective equipment availability), and community (e.g., healthcare worker stigma). The Personal Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Concise scales assessed probable major depression (MD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and alcohol use disorder (AUD), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess unadjusted and adjusted associations between socio-ecological factors and mental health outcomes.
resultsOf the 1,092 participants, 72.0% were female, 51.9% were frontline workers, and the mean age was 40.4 years (standard deviation = 11.5). Based on cut-off scores, 13.9%, 15.6%, 22.8%, and 42.8% had probable MD, GAD, PTSD, and AUD, respectively. In the multivariable adjusted models, needing more social support was associated with significantly higher odds of probable MD, GAD, PTSD, and AUD. The significance of other factors varied across the outcomes. For example, at the individual level, female gender was associated with probable PTSD. At the institutional level, lower team cohesion was associated with probable PTSD, and difficulty following hospital policies with probable MD. At the community level, higher healthcare worker stigma was associated with probable PTSD and AUD, decreased satisfaction with the national government response with probable GAD, and higher media exposure with probable GAD and PTSD.
conclusionsThese findings can inform targeted interventions that promote healthcare workers' psychological resilience during disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.