Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544721›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Recognition of child maltreatment in emergency departments in Europe: Should we do better?

F Hoedeman, P J Puiman, A W Smits, M I Dekker, H Diderich-Lolkes de Beer, S Laribi, D Lauwaert, R Oostenbrink, N Parri, L García-Castrillo Riesgo and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

F HoedemanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7854-4222
P J PuimanDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
A W SmitsAugeo Foundation, Driebergen, The Netherlands.
M I DekkerAugeo Foundation, Driebergen, The Netherlands.
H Diderich-Lolkes de BeerEmergency Department, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, The Netherlands.
S LaribiEmergency Department, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
D LauwaertEmergency Department, University Hospital Brussels (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
R OostenbrinkDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
N ParriEmergency Department & Trauma Center, Ospedale Pediatrico Meyer Firenze, Florence, Italy.
L García-Castrillo RiesgoEmergency Department, University Hospital Marques de Valdecilla, Cantabria, Spain.
H A MollDepartment of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the different policies to recognize child maltreatment in emergency departments (EDs) in Europe in order to define areas of improvement.

methodsA survey was conducted on the recognition of child maltreatment in EDs in European countries with a focus on screening methods, parental risk factors, training and hospital policies. The survey was distributed through different key members from the EUSEM, REPEM and the EuSEN. A summary score based on the NICE guideline (4 questions on child characteristics, 4 questions on parental characteristics and 5 questions on hospital policy) was calculated.

resultsWe analysed 185 completed surveys, representing 148 hospitals from 29 European countries. Of the respondents, 28.6% used a screening tool, and 31.8% had guidelines on parental risk factors. A total of 42.2% did not follow training based on child characteristics, and 57.6% did not follow training on parental characteristics. A total of 71.9% indicated that there was a need for training. 50.8% of the respondents reported a standardized policy for the detection of child maltreatment. Translating the survey results to NICE summary scores of the EDs in Europe, we found that 25.6% (34/133) met most, 22.6% (30/133) met some and 51.9% (69/133) met few of the NICE guideline recommendations. More specifically, with respect to hospital policies, 33.8% (45/133) met most, 15.0% (20/133) met some and 51.1% (68/133) met few of the NICE guideline recommendations.

conclusionThere is high variability regarding policies for child maltreatment detection and only a quarter of the EDs met most of the NICE guideline recommendations for child maltreatment. There is a need for the use of screening tools, training of ED staff and implementation of local hospital policies.

Indexed as

Child AbuseEmergency Service, HospitalGuideline AdherenceAdolescentChildEuropeHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33544721
PMCPMC7864669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.