Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33544692›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2021

Rapid Response to Drive COVID-19 Research in a Learning Health Care System: Rationale and Design of the Houston Methodist COVID-19 Surveillance and Outcomes Registry (CURATOR).

Farhaan Vahidy, Stephen L Jones, Mauricio E Tano, Juan Carlos Nicolas, Osman A Khan, Jennifer R Meeks, Alan P Pan, Terri Menser, Farzan Sasangohar, George Naufal and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Managerial Responses to the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Healthcare Organizations Project Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farhaan VahidyHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3464-2111
Stephen L JonesHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1106-171X
Mauricio E TanoHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-3869
Juan Carlos NicolasHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-7339
Osman A KhanHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4386-4015
Jennifer R MeeksHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4689-0531
Alan P PanHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8782-8024
Terri MenserHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-2590
Farzan SasangoharHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9962-5470
George NaufalHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5357-1841
Dirk SostmanHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0368-5255
Khurram NasirHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5376-2269
Bita A KashHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9491-6815
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the challenges of meaningful health care digitization. The need for rapid yet validated decision-making requires robust data infrastructure. Organizations with a focus on learning health care (LHC) systems tend to adapt better to rapidly evolving data needs. Few studies have demonstrated a successful implementation of data digitization principles in an LHC context across health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveWe share our experience and provide a framework for assembling and organizing multidisciplinary resources, structuring and regulating research needs, and developing a single source of truth (SSoT) for COVID-19 research by applying fundamental principles of health care digitization, in the context of LHC systems across a complex health care organization.

methodsHouston Methodist (HM) comprises eight tertiary care hospitals and an expansive primary care network across Greater Houston, Texas. During the early phase of the pandemic, institutional leadership envisioned the need to streamline COVID-19 research and established the retrospective research task force (RRTF). We describe an account of the structure, functioning, and productivity of the RRTF. We further elucidate the technical and structural details of a comprehensive data repository-the HM COVID-19 Surveillance and Outcomes Registry (CURATOR). We particularly highlight how CURATOR conforms to standard health care digitization principles in the LHC context.

resultsThe HM COVID-19 RRTF comprises expertise in epidemiology, health systems, clinical domains, data sciences, information technology, and research regulation. The RRTF initially convened in March 2020 to prioritize and streamline COVID-19 observational research; to date, it has reviewed over 60 protocols and made recommendations to the institutional review board (IRB). The RRTF also established the charter for CURATOR, which in itself was IRB-approved in April 2020. CURATOR is a relational structured query language database that is directly populated with data from electronic health records, via largely automated extract, transform, and load procedures. The CURATOR design enables longitudinal tracking of COVID-19 cases and controls before and after COVID-19 testing. CURATOR has been set up following the SSoT principle and is harmonized across other COVID-19 data sources. CURATOR eliminates data silos by leveraging unique and disparate big data sources for COVID-19 research and provides a platform to capitalize on institutional investment in cloud computing. It currently hosts deeply phenotyped sociodemographic, clinical, and outcomes data of approximately 200,000 individuals tested for COVID-19. It supports more than 30 IRB-approved protocols across several clinical domains and has generated numerous publications from its core and associated data sources.

conclusionsA data-driven decision-making strategy is paramount to the success of health care organizations. Investment in cross-disciplinary expertise, health care technology, and leadership commitment are key ingredients to foster an LHC system. Such systems can mitigate the effects of ongoing and future health care catastrophes by providing timely and validated decision support.

Indexed as

COVID-19databases, factualdata curationdata scienceelectronic health recordslearning health systemSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33544692
PMCPMC7903978
OpenAlexW3123364941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.